SP-050: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Medullary and Other Thyroid Carcinoma

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S20
Author(s):  
M. Schlumberger
2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (03) ◽  
pp. 149-160
Author(s):  
Frederik A. Verburg ◽  
Holger Amthauer ◽  
Ina Binse ◽  
Ingo Brink ◽  
Andreas Buck ◽  
...  

AbstractNotwithstanding regulatory approval of lenvatinib and sorafenib to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RAI-R DTC), important questions and controversies persist regarding this use of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RAI-R DTC experts from German tertiary referral centers convened to identify and explore such issues; this paper summarizes their discussions. One challenge is determining when to start TKI therapy. Decision-making should be shared between patients and multidisciplinary caregivers, and should consider tumor size/burden, growth rate, and site(s), the key drivers of RAI-R DTC morbidity and mortality, along with current and projected tumor-related symptomatology, co-morbidities, and performance status. Another question involves choice of first-line TKIs. Currently, lenvatinib is generally preferred, due to greater increase in progression-free survival versus placebo treatment and higher response rate in its pivotal trial versus that of sorafenib; additionally, in those studies, lenvatinib but not sorafenib showed overall survival benefit in subgroup analysis. Whether recommended maximum or lower TKI starting doses better balance anti-tumor effects versus tolerability is also unresolved. Exploratory analyses of lenvatinib pivotal study data suggest dose-response effects, possibly favoring higher dosing; however, results are awaited of a prospective comparison of lenvatinib starting regimens. Some controversy surrounds determination of net therapeutic benefit, the key criterion for continuing TKI therapy: if tolerability is acceptable, overall disease control may justify further treatment despite limited but manageable progression. Future research should assess potential guideposts for starting TKIs; fine-tune dosing strategies and further characterize antitumor efficacy; and evaluate interventions to prevent and/or treat TKI toxicity, particularly palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and fatigue.


2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 597-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Ito ◽  
Shinichi Suzuki ◽  
Ken-ichi Ito ◽  
Tsuneo Imai ◽  
Takahiro Okamoto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (08) ◽  
pp. 588-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maran Ilanchezhian ◽  
Sophia Khan ◽  
Christian Okafor ◽  
John Glod ◽  
Jaydira Del Rivero

AbstractMedullary Thyroid Carcinoma (MTC) is a rare neuroendocrine cancer that accounts for 1–2% of thyroid cancers in the United States (U.S.). While most cases are sporadic, 25% of MTC cases are hereditary. These hereditary cases occur in the setting of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A (MEN2A) or 2B (MEN2B) driven by mutations in the Rearranged during Transfection RET proto-oncogene. This article discusses hereditary MTC in the setting of MEN2 and the treatment options available for it. The first line treatment for this disease is typically a total thyroidectomy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, vandetanib and cabozantinib, have been approved for treatment of advanced MTC, but options beyond those are limited. However, several promising treatments are being studied, which are discussed in this review.


2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrieke C Hoftijzer ◽  
Ellen Kapiteijn ◽  
Tatiana Schneider ◽  
Guido C Hovens ◽  
Hans Morreau ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jolanta Krajewska ◽  
Aleksandra Kukulska ◽  
Ewa Paliczka-Cieslik ◽  
Tomasz Gawlik ◽  
Tomasz Olczyk ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 172 (5) ◽  
pp. R215-R225 ◽  
Author(s):  
E N Klein Hesselink ◽  
D Steenvoorden ◽  
E Kapiteijn ◽  
E P Corssmit ◽  
A N A van der Horst-Schrivers ◽  
...  

ContextMany tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been studied in patients with thyroid carcinoma (TC). However, the effect and toxicity of various TKIs in differentiated TC (DTC) and medullary TC (MTC) patients have not been directly compared. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to systematically summarize response and toxicity of TKIs in TC patients.MethodsAll major databases were systematically searched for publications on TKIs in TC. Primary endpoint was objective response; secondary endpoints were clinical benefit, percentage TKI dose reduction/discontinuation, hand–foot syndrome, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting. Meta-analysis was performed using an exact likelihood approach and a logistic regression. Pooled percentages and 95% CIs were reported.ResultsIn total, 22 publications were included. For DTC patients, gefitinib induced no objective responses. Pooled percentage was highest for pazopanib, 49 (95% CI 33–64)%, and was 17 (95% CI 12–24)% for sorafenib. For MTC, gefitinib and imatinib induced no objective responses, whereas sunitinib induced objective response in 43 (95% CI 14–77)%. For vandetanib and cabozantinib, these numbers were 40 (95% CI 34–46)% and 27 (95% CI 22–32)% respectively. Clinical benefit was found in 53 (95% CI 48–59)% of DTC patients on sorafenib, and in 84 (95% CI 79–88)% and 55 (95% CI 49–61)% of MTC patients on vandetanib and cabozantinib respectively. All TKIs were associated with considerable toxicity.ConclusionThe currently studied TKIs show a modest response, while side effects are not negligible. Therefore, we suggest to solely consider TKIs in TC patients with rapid progressive disease, for whom the benefits of treatment outweigh toxicity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-153
Author(s):  
Antonia García-Martín ◽  
Pablo José López-Ibarra Lozano ◽  
Eva María Triviño-Ibáñez ◽  
Fernando Escobar-Jiménez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document