scholarly journals Some improved estimators of finite population quantile using auxiliary information in sample surveys

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 825-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M. Rueda ◽  
A. Arcos ◽  
M.D. Martı́nez-Miranda ◽  
Y. Román
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-85
Author(s):  
Mir Subzar ◽  
S. Maqbool ◽  
T. A. Raja ◽  
Muhammad Abid ◽  
Faizan Danish

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Nelson Kiprono Bii ◽  
Christopher Ouma Onyango ◽  
John Odhiambo

Nonresponse is a potential source of errors in sample surveys. It introduces bias and large variance in the estimation of finite population parameters. Regression models have been recognized as one of the techniques of reducing bias and variance due to random nonresponse using auxiliary data. In this study, it is assumed that random nonresponse occurs in the survey variable in the second stage of cluster sampling, assuming full auxiliary information is available throughout. Auxiliary information is used at the estimation stage via a regression model to address the problem of random nonresponse. In particular, auxiliary information is used via an improved Nadaraya–Watson kernel regression technique to compensate for random nonresponse. The asymptotic bias and mean squared error of the estimator proposed are derived. Besides, a simulation study conducted indicates that the proposed estimator has smaller values of the bias and smaller mean squared error values compared to existing estimators of a finite population mean. The proposed estimator is also shown to have tighter confidence interval lengths at 95% coverage rate. The results obtained in this study are useful for instance in choosing efficient estimators of a finite population mean in demographic sample surveys.


1997 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.K. Agarwal ◽  
U.K. Sharma ◽  
Sharmishtha Kashyap

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 691-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi Noma ◽  
Shiro Tanaka

The case-cohort design has been widely adopted for reducing the cost of covariate measurements in large prospective cohort studies. Under the case-cohort design, complete covariate data are collected only on randomly sampled cases and a subcohort randomly selected from the whole cohort. For the analysis of case-cohort studies with binary outcomes, logistic regression analysis has been routinely used. However, in many applications, certain covariates are readily measured on all samples from the whole cohort, and the case-cohort design may be regarded as a two-phase sampling design. Using this auxiliary covariate information, estimators for the regression parameters can be substantially improved. In this article, we discuss the theoretical basis of the case-cohort design derived from the formulation of the two-phase design and the improved estimators using whole-cohort auxiliary variable information. In particular, we show that the sampling scheme of the case-cohort design is substantially equivalent to that of conventional two-phase case-control studies (also known as two-stage case-control studies for epidemiologists), i.e., the methodologies of two-phase case-control studies can be directly applied to case-cohort data. Under this framework, we review and apply the following improved estimators to the case-cohort design with binary outcomes: (i) weighted estimators, (ii) a semiparametric maximum likelihood estimator, and (iii) a multiple imputation estimator. In addition, based on the framework of the two-phase design, we can obtain risk ratio and risk difference estimators without the rare-disease assumption. We illustrate these methodologies via simulations and the National Wilms Tumor Study data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document