Complete Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release in Long-Term Haemodialysis Patients

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 668-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. OKUTSU ◽  
I. HAMANAKA ◽  
T. TANABE ◽  
Y. TAKATORI ◽  
S. NINOMIYA
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Distal Portion ◽  
Proximal Portion ◽  
Flexor Retinaculum ◽  
Endoscopic Release ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Infusion Technique

The roof of the carpal tunnel (or canal) consists of the distal portion of the flexor retinaculum, the flexor retinaculum (or the transverse carpal ligament) and the proximal portion of the flexor retinaculum. We tried to determine which anatomical structures were relevant to complete endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression in long-term haemodialysis patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Carpal tunnel pressure was measured using the continuous infusion technique before and after endoscopic release of the flexor retinaculum, distal portion of the flexor retinaculum and the proximal portion of the flexor retinaculum respectively in 257 hands. We concluded that release of the distal portion of the flexor retinaculum, in addition to the flexor retinaculum, is essential for complete carpal tunnel decompression in long-term haemodialysis patients.

INVESTIGATION OF SEGMENTAL CARPAL TUNNEL PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME — IS IT NECESSARY TO RELEASE THE DISTAL APONEUROTIC PORTION OF THE FLEXOR RETINACULUM IN ENDOSCOPIC CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE SURGERY?

Hand Surgery ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 205-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Murata ◽  
Hiroshi Yajima ◽  
Naoki Maegawa ◽  
Koji Hattori ◽  
Yoshinori Takakura
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Guide Wire ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Flexor Retinaculum ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery

Segmental carpal tunnel pressure was measured in 12 hands of 11 idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome patients before and after two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. We aimed to determine at which part of the carpal tunnel the median nerve could be compressed, and to evaluate whether carpal tunnel pressure could be reduced sufficiently at all segments of the carpal tunnel after the surgery. Pressure measurements were performed using a pressure guide wire. The site with the highest pressure corresponded to the area around the hamate hook; the pressure in the area distal to the flexor retinaculum could be pathogenically high (more than 30 mmHg) before the surgery. The two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release achieved sufficient pressure reduction in all segments of the carpal tunnel when the flexor retinaculum and the fibrous structure between the flexor retinaculum and the palmar aponeurosis were completely released.

Trigger Digit Incidence After Carpal Tunnel Release: Reconstruction in Elongated Position Versus Traditional Carpal Tunnel Release

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471989305
Author(s):  
Ignacio Esteban-Feliu ◽  
Irene Gallardo-Calero ◽  
Sergi Barrera-Ochoa ◽  
Núria Vidal-Tarrason ◽  
Jorge Nuñez-Camarena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Flexor Retinaculum ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Reconstruction Group ◽  
Long Term Studies

Background: The development of trigger digit after carpal tunnel syndrome release surgery has been widely reported. Lluch described reconstruction of the flexor retinaculum in elongated position to prevent such complication. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review to determine whether patients who undergo reconstruction in elongated position of the flexor retinaculum have a lower incidence of trigger digit postoperatively. In total, 1050 patients were included, 865 of whom had undergone traditional carpal tunnel release and 185 flexor retinaculum reconstruction. Results: No differences were found in the incidence of trigger digit after surgery (8.7% of the patients who underwent traditional release vs 11.9% in the reconstruction group). Neither difference was found when comparing mean time with the development of trigger digit. Conclusions: In the absence of randomized long-term studies comparing traditional release and reconstruction in elongated position after carpal tunnel release, given our results, we see no reason to favor reconstruction over standard carpal tunnel release as a means to prevent postoperative triggering of digits.

Failed Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. VARITIMIDIS ◽  
J. H. HERNDON ◽  
D. G. SOTEREANOS
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Saphenous Vein Graft ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Flexor Retinaculum ◽  
Endoscopic Release ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Age Range

From 1994 to 1997, 22 patients (24 wrists) underwent open revision carpal tunnel release for persistent carpal tunnel syndrome after a primary endoscopic release. The age range was from 21 to 77 years. At the time of revision surgery, 22 wrists had an incomplete release of the flexor retinaculum and two patients had median nerve transection (one partial and one complete). One patient had release of Guyon’s canal and not the carpal tunnel. After the open revision carpal tunnel release, 20 patients returned to work with five patients returning to jobs of lighter duty. In addition, these 20 patients had significant improvement in symptoms. The remaining two patients had sustained a median nerve injury and did not return to work. One of these patients developed a painful neuroma in continuity of the median nerve which required vein wrapping with a saphenous vein graft. This study indicates that endoscopic release of the flexor retinaculum holds the same risks and complications as open release. Based on our study we believe that patients with persistent carpal tunnel syndrome after failed endoscopic flexor retinaculum release can be successfully treated with open release.

An Assessment of Sleep Disturbance in Patients before and after Carpal Tunnel Release

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. 144-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Erickson ◽  
Daniel Polatsch ◽  
Steven Beldner ◽  
Eitan Melamed
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
English Speaking

Background: Night time numbness is a key characteristic of CTS and relief of night time symptoms is one of the outcomes most important to patients. This study tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference between sleep quality and night symptoms before and after carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods: Forty-four, English-speaking adult patients requesting open CTR for electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome completed questionnaires before and after surgery. Average age was 59, 24 patients were men and 20 were women. Patient with a primary or secondary sleep disorder were excluded. Before surgery, patients completed the Pittsburg Sleep Quality index (PSQI). At an average of 3 months after surgery, participants completed PSQI questionnaires. Onset of sleep quality improvement was specifically addressed. Differences between preoperative and postoperative sleep quality were evaluated using the paired t-test. Spearman correlations were used to assess the relationship between continuous variables. Results: Of the 44 patients, 32 (72%) were classified as poor sleepers (PSQI > 5.5) prior to surgery. At 3 months follow up, there was a significant improvement PSQI global scores (7.8 ± 5.1 vs 4 ± 3.5, p < 0.001) as well as subdivisions. Daytime dysfunction (0.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.001) and medication use (1.0 ± 1.2 vs 0.9 ± 1.2, p < 0.045) secondary to sleep disturbance and was improved as well. In all patients, onset of improvement was within 24 hours of surgery. Conclusions: CTR is associated with improvement in sleep quality at 3 months follow-up. CTR improves daytime dysfunction related to the sleep disturbance. The onset of sleep improvement is 24 hours after surgery in most cases.

Use of Nerve Conduction Studies and the Pressure-Specified Sensory Device in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. SLUTSKY
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Conduction ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Nerve Conduction Studies ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Asymptomatic Volunteers ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Sixty-nine patients with signs of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS) and testing with the Pressure-Specified Sensory Device (PSSD). A total of 102 tests were performed (28 bilateral). Twenty patients underwent a carpal tunnel release and were retested after 4 to 6 months. The Symptom Severity Score (SSS) was calculated before and after surgery. A control group of 20 hands in 10 asymptomatic volunteers underwent identical testing. The NCS sensitivity was 87% with a specificity of 90% whereas the PSSD sensitivity was 81% with a specificity of 65%. The combined sensitivity of the two tests was 93%. In the operative group the SSS improved from a mean of 3.34 pre-operatively to 1.95 postoperatively. The NCS improved in 19/21 hands whereas the PSSD improved in 16/19 hands. The non-invasive SSS and PSSD can increase the diagnostic yield in CTS, especially when the NCS are normal.

Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. ARMSTONG ◽  
J. R. FLYNN ◽  
D. M. DAVIES
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Endoscopic Release ◽  
Iatrogenic Nerve Injury ◽  
Portal Technique ◽  
Results Of Surgery

We report our experience over a 30 month period of endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel by the Chow two-portal technique. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term subjective results of surgery and to assess if any iatrogenic nerve injury had been caused by the endoscopic procedure. The follow-up period was from 3 to 34 months. Our permanent, iatrogenic, postoperative nerve complication rate was 0.9% (2/208). No other serious complications occurred.

ENDOSCOPIC CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE FOR RECURRENT CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME AFTER PREVIOUS OPEN RELEASE

Hand Surgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 235-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lam Chuan Teoh ◽  
Puay Ling Tan
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Endoscopic Release ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Open Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Surgical Release

Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome from various causes has been shown to occur in up to 19% of patients. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been used to decompress the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome for many years. However, endoscopic release for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome after previous surgical release has not been reported. Nine hands in six patients had recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome five to 20 years after previous open carpal tunnel release. All the cases were successfully treated with endoscopic release.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document