Phase-space density mappings for diffuse auroral electrons under strong pitch-angle diffusion in Dungey's model magnetosphere

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1739-1746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Schulz ◽  
Margaret W. Chen
Author(s):  
R. M. Millan ◽  
J.-F. Ripoll ◽  
O. Santolík ◽  
W. S. Kurth

In August 2015, the Balloon Array for Radiation belt Relativistic Electron Losses (BARREL) observed precipitation of energetic (<200 keV) electrons magnetically conjugate to a region of dense cold plasma as measured by the twin Van Allen Probes spacecraft. The two spacecraft passed through the high density region during multiple orbits, showing that the structure was spatial and relatively stable over many hours. The region, identified as a plasmaspheric plume, was filled with intense hiss-like plasma waves. We use a quasi-linear diffusion model to investigate plume whistler-mode hiss waves as the cause of precipitation observed by BARREL. The model input parameters are based on the observed wave, plasma and energetic particle properties obtained from Van Allen Probes. Diffusion coefficients are found to be largest in the same energy range as the precipitation observed by BARREL, indicating that the plume hiss waves were responsible for the precipitation. The event-driven pitch angle diffusion simulation is also used to investigate the evolution of the electron phase space density (PSD) for different energies and assumed initial pitch angle distributions. The results show a complex temporal evolution of the phase space density, with periods of both growth and loss. The earliest dynamics, within the ∼5 first minutes, can be controlled by a growth of the PSD near the loss cone (by a factor up to ∼2, depending on the conditions, pitch angle, and energy), favored by the absence of a gradient at the loss cone and by the gradients of the initial pitch angle distribution. Global loss by 1-3 orders of magnitude (depending on the energy) occurs within the first ∼100 min of wave-particle interaction. The prevalence of plasmaspheric plumes and detached plasma regions suggests whistler-mode hiss waves could be an important driver of electron loss even at high L-value (L ∼6), outside of the main plasmasphere.


2016 ◽  
Vol 121 (10) ◽  
pp. 9459-9472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Ren ◽  
Q. G. Zong ◽  
X. Z. Zhou ◽  
R. Rankin ◽  
Y. F. Wang

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ferrari ◽  
R. E. Drullinger ◽  
N. Poli ◽  
F. Sorrentino ◽  
G. M. Tino

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (A5) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingxian Luo ◽  
Xinlin Li ◽  
Weichao Tu ◽  
Jiancun Gong ◽  
Siqing Liu

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. H. Zhang ◽  
J. Barrette ◽  
C. Gale

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milla Kalliokoski ◽  
Emilia Kilpua ◽  
Adnane Osmane ◽  
Allison Jaynes ◽  
Drew Turner ◽  
...  

&lt;p&gt;The energetic electron content in the Van Allen radiation belts surrounding the Earth can vary dramatically on timescales from minutes to days, and these electrons present a hazard for spacecraft traversing the belts. The outer belt response to solar wind driving is however yet largely unpredictable. Here we investigate the driving of the belts by sheath regions preceding interplanetary coronal mass ejections. Electron dynamics in the belts is governed by various competing acceleration, transport and loss processes. We analyzed electron phase space density to compare the energization and loss mechanisms during a geoeffective and a non-geoeffective sheath region. These two case studies indicate that ULF-driven inward and outward radial transport, together with the incursions of the magnetopause, play a key role in causing the outer belt electron flux variations. Chorus waves also likely contribute to energization during the geoeffective event. A global picture of the wave activity is achieved through a chorus proxy utilizing POES measurements. We highlight that also the non-geoeffective sheath presented distinct changes in outer belt electron fluxes, which is also evidenced by our statistical study of outer belt electron fluxes during sheath events. While not as intense as during geoeffective sheaths, significant changes in outer belt electron fluxes occur also during sheaths that do not cause major geomagnetic disturbances.&lt;/p&gt;


2016 ◽  
Vol 462 (1) ◽  
pp. 663-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iryna Butsky ◽  
Andrea V. Macciò ◽  
Aaron A. Dutton ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
Aura Obreja ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shevchenko ◽  
A. Jaakkola ◽  
T. Lindvall ◽  
I. Tittonen ◽  
M. Kaivola

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Yurievich Drozdov ◽  
Hayley J Allison ◽  
Yuri Y Shprits ◽  
Maria E. Usanova ◽  
Anthony A. Saikin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document