Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal in Moving-Bed Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactors

1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (4-5) ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1607-1615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sari Luostarinen ◽  
Sami Luste ◽  
Lara Valentín ◽  
Jukka Rintala

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1889-1894 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Wantawin ◽  
J. Juateea ◽  
P. L. Noophan ◽  
J. Munakata-Marr

Conventional nitrification-denitrification treatment is a common way to treat nitrogen in wastewater, but this process is costly for low COD/N wastewaters due to the addition of air and external carbon-source. However, ammonia may alternatively be converted to dinitrogen gas by autotrophic bacteria utilizing aerobically autotrophically produced nitrite as an electron acceptor under anoxic conditions. Lab-scale sequencing batch biofilm reactors (SBBRs) inoculated with normal nitrifying sludge were employed to study the potential of an oxygen-limited autotrophic nitrification-denitrification process initiated with typical nitrifying sludge for treating a synthetic ammonia wastewater devoid of organic carbon in one step. The ring-laced fibrous carrier (length 0.32 m, surface area 3.4 m2/m) was fixed vertically in a 3 L reactor. Two different air supply modes were applied:continuous aeration to control dissolved oxygen at 1.5 mg/L and intermittent aeration. High nitrogen removals of more than 50% were obtained in both SBBRs. At an ammonia loading of 0.882 gm N/m2-day [hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 24 hr], the SBBR continuously aerated to 1.5 mg DO/L had slightly higher nitrogen removal (64%) than the intermittently alternated SBBR (55%). The main form of residual nitrogen in the effluent was ammonia, at concentrations of 25 mg/L and 37 mg N/L in continuous and intermittent aeration SBBRs, respectively. Ammonia was completely consumed when ammonia loading was reduced to 0.441 gm N/m2-day [HRT extended to 48 hr]. The competitive use of nitrite by aerobic nitrite oxidizing bacteria (ANOB) with anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (anammox bacteria) during the expanded aeration period under low remaining ammonia concentration resulted in higher nitrate production and lower nitrogen loss in the continuous aeration SBBR than in the intermittent aeration SBBR. The nitrogen removal efficiencies in SBBRs with continuous and alternating aerated were 80% and 86% respectively. Specific microorganisms in the biofilm were characterized using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Aerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AAOB) occurred side by side with putative anammox bacteria (cells hybridizing with probe AMX820) throughout the biofilm, though ANOB were rarely detected.


1995 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjørn Rusten ◽  
Lars J. Hem ◽  
Hallvard Ødegaard

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Rusten ◽  
V. A. Razafimanantsoa ◽  
M. A. Andriamiarinjaka ◽  
C. L. Otis ◽  
A. K. Sahu ◽  
...  

The purpose of this project was to investigate the effect of selective particle removal during primary treatment on nitrogen removal in moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs). Two small MBBR pilot plants were operated in parallel, where one train treated 2 mm screened municipal wastewater and the other train treated wastewater that had passed through a Salsnes Filter SF1000 rotating belt sieve (RBS) with a 33 µs sieve cloth. The SF1000 was operated without a filter mat on the belt. The tests confirmed that, for the wastewater characteristics at the test plant, Salsnes Filter primary treatment with a 33 µs RBS and no filter mat produced a primary effluent that was close to optimum. Removal of organic matter with the 33 µs sieve had no negative effect on the denitrification process. Nitrification rates improved by 10–15% in the train with 33 µs RBS primary treatment. Mass balance calculations showed that without RBS primary treatment, the oxygen demand in the biological system was 36% higher. Other studies have shown that the sludge produced by RBS primary treatment is beneficial for biogas production and will also significantly improve sludge dewatering of the combined primary and biological sludge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 414 ◽  
pp. 125535
Author(s):  
Ellen Edefell ◽  
Per Falås ◽  
Elena Torresi ◽  
Marinette Hagman ◽  
Michael Cimbritz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document