Risk factors for deep infection in secondary intramedullary nailing after external fixation for open tibial fractures

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 91-92
Author(s):  
M.F. Swiontkowski
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Open Tibial Fractures

Risk factors for deep infection in secondary intramedullary nailing after external fixation for open tibial fractures

Injury ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 554-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Yokoyama ◽  
Masataka Uchino ◽  
Koushin Nakamura ◽  
Hiroshi Ohtsuka ◽  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Open Tibial Fractures

scholarly journals Immediate Interlocking Nailing versus External Fixation Followed by Delayed Interlocking Nailing for Gustilo Type IIIB Open Tibial Fractures

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
HJ Park ◽  
M Uchino ◽  
K Nakamura ◽  
M Ueno ◽  
Y Kojima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Fracture Site ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Fracture Type ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Open Tibial Fractures ◽  
Interlocking Nailing ◽  
Type Iiib

Purpose. To compare immediate interlocking nailing with external fixation followed by delayed interlocking nailing, for Gustilo type IIIB open tibial fractures. Methods. 23 patients with Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures were treated with either immediate unreamed interlocking nailing (n=9) or external fixation followed by delayed unreamed interlocking nailing (n=14). Patient age, sex ratio, fracture site, fracture type, and severity were similar in both groups. The time to union, deep infection rate, and nonunion rate in the 2 groups were compared. Results. In the immediate and delayed nailing groups, respective mean times to union were 21 (standard deviation [SD], 14) months and 14 (SD, 8) months; nonunion rates were 44% (4/9) and 36% (5/14), and deep infection rates were 22% (2/9) and 7% (1/14). All corresponding differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion. Prospective, randomised, multicentre studies are needed to assess whether there are significant differences between the 2 treatment methods.

EXTERNAL FIXATION AND SECONDARY INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING OF OPEN TIBIAL FRACTURES

1997 ◽  
Vol 79-B (3) ◽  
pp. 433-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Antich-Adrover ◽  
D. Martí-Garin ◽  
J. Murias-Alvarez ◽  
C. Puente-Alonso
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Open Tibial Fractures

EXTERNAL FIXATION VERSUS UNREAMED INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING IN CONTAMINATED OPEN TIBIAL FRACTURES

1992 ◽  
Vol 85 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 3S-73
Author(s):  
D. Bhatia ◽  
R. H. Jinnah ◽  
M. Mont ◽  
P. R. Brown ◽  
M. J. Curtis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Open Tibial Fractures

scholarly journals Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Fixation in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures in Tanzania

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (10) ◽  
pp. 896-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billy T. Haonga ◽  
Max Liu ◽  
Patrick Albright ◽  
Sravya T. Challa ◽  
Syed H. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Open Tibial Fractures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document