Impact of biochemical failure on overall survival within ten years after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

Author(s):  
C Patel ◽  
C.A Reddy ◽  
P.A Kupelian
Author(s):  
Patrick A Kupelian ◽  
Jeffrey C Buchsbaum ◽  
Chandrika Patel ◽  
Mohamed Elshaikh ◽  
Chandana A Reddy ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Chad A. Reichard ◽  
Evan Kovac ◽  
Jay P. Ciezki ◽  
Rahul D. Tendulkar ◽  
Eric A. Klein ◽  
...  

65 Background: Mortality among men with biochemical failure (BF) after treatment is variable. We examined the long-term survival of men with BF to determine if differences exist, depending on original treatment modality. Methods: Between 1995 and 2008, 6,084 patients underwent treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer at our institution (4,276 underwent radical prostatectomy (RP); 1,808 underwent EBRT). Clinical information and follow up data was obtained from prospectively maintained databases. Survival was assessed using log rank test. Results: 526 (12%) patients had BF defined by PSA > 0.4 after RP. 326 (18%) patients had BF after EBRT, defined as PSA nadir +2. 197 (60%) of EBRT patients received ADT as neoadjuvant/concurrent/adjuvant therapy. Median overall survival was 154 months (95%CI 148-157) versus 129 months (95%CI 123-135) for RP and EBRT respectively (p<.0001). Median prostate cancer specific survival was 125 months (95%CI 93-148) versus 107 months (95%CI 92-123) for RP and EBRT respectively (p=0.17). There was no difference in prostate cancer specific survival between treatments among patients in D’Amico intermediate and high risk groups. Conclusions: In patients with biochemical recurrence after definitive treatment, patients treated with RP have improved overall survival compared to patients treated with EBRT. However, there is no difference among treatment groups in prostate cancer specific survival.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vi243 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Xie ◽  
C. Sweeney ◽  
M. Regan ◽  
M. Nakabayashi ◽  
M. Buyse ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e417
Author(s):  
X. Bonet ◽  
J.F. Suárez ◽  
M. Castells ◽  
A.J. Vicéns ◽  
E. Franco ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heikki Seikkula ◽  
Peter J. Boström ◽  
Karri Seppä ◽  
Janne Pitkäniemi ◽  
Nea Malila ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains a primary treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa) even though there is no evidence that its use is beneficial in the absence of curative treatment.Methods: Men aged ≥70 years (n = 16534) diagnosed with localized PCa from 1985 to 2014 and managed either with primary observation or ADT in the absence of curative treatment were included. The cases were identified from the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry. We estimated the standardized mortality ratios (SMR) for overall mortality by treatment group. We determined the relative risk (RR) of PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and other-cause mortality between the two treatment groups. Survival was determined using the life table method. Two age groups (70–79 years and ≥80 years) and three calendar time cohorts (1985–1994, 1995–2004, and 2005–2014) were compared following adjustment of propensity score matching between the treatment groups with four covariates (age, year of diagnosis, educational level, and hospital district). Follow-up continued until death or until December 31, 2015. Results: Patients in the observation group had lower overall SMRs than those in the ADT group in both age cohorts over the entire study period. PCSM was higher in men aged 70–79 years undergoing primary ADT compared to those managed by observation only (RR: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29–2.23 [1985–1994]; RR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.35–1.84 [1995–2004]; and RR 2.71, 95% CI: 2.08–3.53 [2005–2014]); p = 0.005 for periodic trend. A similar trend over time was also observed in men aged >80 years; (p for age–period interaction = 0.237). Overall survival was also higher among men in their 70’s managed by observation compared to those undergoing ADT.Conclusions: Primary ADT within four months period from diagnosis is not associated with improved long-term overall survival or decreased PCSM compared to primary conservative management for men with localized PCa. However, this observational study’s conclusions should be weighted with confounding factors related to cancer aggressiveness and comorbidities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document