scholarly journals Transradial approach for ad hoc coronary interventions: procedural results and vascular complications

1998 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 17-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Barbeau ◽  
O. Gleeton ◽  
L. Roy ◽  
S. Plante ◽  
C. Juneau ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Giovanni Amoroso ◽  

The concept of downsized catheters (i.e., using catheters smaller than 6 French) for invasive coronary procedures, such as diagnostic cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention, has been developing over the years, particularly as a result of the rise of the transradial approach. Recent advances have allowed the use of smaller and sheathless catheters, which confer a number of advantages – such as fewer vascular complications, reduced use of contrast agent and reduced haemostasis – thus increasing patient safety and comfort and allowing more rapid patient mobilisation. Reductions in patient complications, number and length of hospital stay, and amount of contrast agent used can also lead to cost savings. While the use of smaller catheters has been hindered in the past because of poor angiographic image quality, new automated contrast injectors have helped overcome this limitation. There is a need to make interventional cardiologists worldwide more aware of the benefits of downsizing, in the light of the latest technical developments and the increased use of transradial approach.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen Garg ◽  
Koneru Lakshmi Umamaheswar ◽  
Aditya Kapoor ◽  
Satendra Tewari ◽  
Roopali Khanna ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 344-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahek Shah ◽  
Deepakraj Gajanana ◽  
David S. Wheeler ◽  
Chitra Punjabi ◽  
Obiora Maludum ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Johannsen ◽  
Amir A. Mahabadi ◽  
Matthias Totzeck ◽  
Andrea Krueger ◽  
Rolf Alexander Jánosi ◽  
...  

AbstractMechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are increasingly used to provide hemodynamic stability for patients with severe coronary artery disease, comorbidities, and/or impaired hemodynamics during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Vascular access site complications, particularly those due to the use of large-bore sheaths, may limit outcomes in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and predictors of vascular complications in protected high-risk PCIs. Therefore, we included patients undergoing high-risk PCI with an Impella device from January 2016 to August 2018. Vascular complications were graded according to ‘Valve Academic Research Consortium-2’, a definition routinely used in transcatheter valve implantation procedures. In total, 61 patients (mean age 72 ± 11 years, 79% male, SYNTAX score 33 ± 7) were included, and angiographic- and fluoroscopic-guided vascular access was used for Impella implantation in all patients. Major vascular complications occurred in 5 male patients (8%). All major vascular complications were treated conservatively without the need for surgical intervention, and only one patient received a transfusion of three erythrocyte concentrates. Regression analysis revealed that patients with peripheral arterial disease of the lower extremities are at higher risk of major vascular complications. In conclusion, the utilization of Impella using a standardized protocol for angiographic- and fluoroscopic-guided vascular access was associated with a low rate of vascular complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-104
Author(s):  
Fahdia Afroz ◽  
Mir Jamal Uddin ◽  
Md Khalquzzaman ◽  
Mohammad Ullah ◽  
Mohammad Khalilur Rahman Siddiqui ◽  
...  

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has been performed traditionally by using femoral approach. Transradial approach has become increasingly popular as it is likely to be less complicating, more comfortable and relatively cost effective having mortality and morbidity benefits. The aim of the study was to compare the in-hospital outcomes of transradial PPCI with that of transfemoral route. Methods: A total of 80 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent PPCI were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided in two groups. Group-I: transradial PPCI; and Group-II: transfemoral PPCI. All patients were followed up during the period of hospital stay and adverse outcomes were observed and compared between the groups. Results: The result showed that bleeding took place in 2.5% patient of Group-I and 15% patients of Group- II. Vascular complications occurred in 2.5% and 12.5% patients of Group-I and Group-II, respectively. In Group-II, 7.5% patients died with none in Group-I. In Group-II, 37.5% patients experienced some sort of adverse outcomes whereas only 15% of the patients of Group-I did have such experiences (p<0.05). Bleeding and vascular complications were significantly more in Group-II (p<0.05). The mean hospital stay time was significantly lower in Group-I (p<0.001). Conclusions: Transradial PPCI is safer than transfemoral approach in respect of procedural and post procedural complications including bleeding, vascular complications and mortality. So, transradial approach may be an attractive alternative to conventional transfemoral approach and can be practiced routinely for PPCI. Cardiovasc. j. 2019; 11(2): 98-104


2006 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 870-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orazio Valsecchi ◽  
Angelina Vassileva ◽  
Giuseppe Musumeci ◽  
Roberta Rossini ◽  
Maurizio Tespili ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document