Paper #144 The use of the knee joint-line balancer to control patella position in revision total knee arthroplasty

Author(s):  
Arno M ten Ham ◽  
Ate Wymenga ◽  
Wilco Jacobs
2009 ◽  
Vol 468 (5) ◽  
pp. 1279-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Romero ◽  
Burkhardt Seifert ◽  
Olaf Reinhardt ◽  
Oliver Ziegler ◽  
Oliver Kessler

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1154-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron A. Hofmann ◽  
Stephen M. Kurtin ◽  
Steve Lyons ◽  
Amie M. Tanner ◽  
Michael P. Bolognesi

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0010
Author(s):  
Murat Celal Sözbilen ◽  
Elcil Kaya Biçer ◽  
Semih Aydoğdu ◽  
Hakkı Sur

Aim: To evaluate the changes in ankle joint line inclination in patients who had total knee arthroplasty due to degenerative osteoarthritis. Material/Method: Sixty-two knees (with a mean age of 71,66±6,78 years, follow-up 52,34±27,42 months) which had undergone total knee arthroplasty between November 1996 and May 2014 were included in this retrospective study. The knee joint line orientations (KJLO) of the prosthesis and ankle joint line inclination (AJLI) relative to the floor were evaluated on postoperative standard standing long-leg X-rays. The AJLI relative to the floor was defined as the angle between the tangent to the subchondral plate of the talus and the horizontal grid line on radiographs. In order to determine the effects of KJLO and high varus on AJLI, patients were divided into two each groups that were pre-operative mechanical axes (MA) as <20° (n=35, group1) and >=20° (n=27, group2) and post-operative MA <3° (n=32, group a) and >=3° (n=30, group b). In addition, the changes in AJLI were compared between each group. The patients were regrouped as either <=3° (n=28, group i) or >3° (n=34, group ii), in terms of the postoperative KJLO. Inclination angles of the prosthesis were compared between each groups. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v18. Results: Mean MA of pre-operative and post-operative were 16,35±6,56° and 3,92±3,35°, respectively. All ankle inclinations were lateralized. AJLI, were significantly decreased from pre-operative mean 7,37°±3,19° to post-operative mean 3,71°±2,22° (p<0,0001). The mean of change was 3,65°±3,03°. However, pre-operative AJLIs were significantly increased in high varus group (group1: 6,34°±2,54°, group2: 8,70°±3,48°, p=0,003); post-operative AJLIs did not differ significantly (group1: 3,55°±2,36°, group2: 3,92°±2,05°, p=0,516) with respect to the MA. The changes in preop-postop AJLI’s were significantly higher in high varus group again (p=0,009). When the KJLO groups were compared, pre-operative AJLIs were significantly different (group i: 6,25°±2,33°, group ii: 8,29°±3,53°, p=0,004) while post-operative AJLIs did not differ significantly (group i: 3,46°±2,38°, group ii: 3,92°±2,08°, p=0,489). Conclusion: Pre-operatively high varus knees also had high ankle varus, hence ankle deformity was corrected by the restoration of the optimal lower limb aligment. Obtaining parallel orientation of the components relative to the ground, restored the AJLI. Pre-operative planning and convenient implantation of the components lead to achieve optimum knee orientation which restored the ankle joint line orientation independent from mechanical axes. Not only the goal of optimum mechanical axes but also optimum knee joint line orientation’s importance was demonsrated.


Author(s):  
Harun R. Gungor ◽  
Nusret Ok

AbstractThere is a tendency of orthopaedic surgeons to elevate joint line (JL) in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Here, we ascertain the use of the spacer block tool (SBT) to determine JL more accurately for less experienced RTKA surgeons. To perform more precise restoration of JL, an SBT with markers was developed and produced using computer software and three-dimensional printers. The study was planned prospectively to include patients who received either condylar constrained or rotating hinge RTKA between January 2016 and December 2019. To determine JL, distance from fibular head (FH), adductor tubercle (AT), and medial epicondyle (ME) were measured on contralateral knee preoperative radiographs and on operated knee postoperative radiographs. Patients were randomized and grouped according to the technique of JL reconstruction. In Group 1, conventional methods by evaluating aforementioned landmarks and preoperative contralateral knee measurements were used to determine JL, whereas in Group 2, the SBT was used. The main outcome measure was the JL change in revised knee postoperatively in contrast to contralateral knee to compare effective restoration of JL between the groups. Twenty-five patients in Group 1 (3 males, 22 females, 72 years, body mass index [BMI] 32.04 ± 4.45) and 20 patients (7 males, 13 females, 74 years, BMI 30.12 ± 5.02) in Group 2 were included in the study. JL measurements for the whole group were FH-JL = 18.3 ± 3.8 mm, AT-JL = 45.8 ± 4.6 mm, and ME-JL = 27.1 ± 2.8 mm preoperatively, and FH-JL = 20.7 ± 4.2 mm, AT-JL = 43.4 ± 5.2 mm, and ME-JL = 24.7 ± 3.1 mm postoperatively. JL level differences in reference to FH, AT, and ME in Group 1 were 3.6 ± 3.1, 3.6 ± 3.5, and 3.4 ± 3.1 mm, respectively, and in Group 2 were 1.0 ± .0.9, 1.3 ± 1.3, and 1.1 ± 1.3 mm, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in JL changes referenced to all of the specific landmarks (p < 0.05). The use of the SBT helped restore JL effectively in our cohort of RTKA patients. Therefore, this tool may become a useful and inexpensive gadget for less experienced and low-volume RTKA surgeons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document