Hemodynamic brain response to visual sexual stimuli is different between homosexual and heterosexual men

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 930-930
Author(s):  
S.-H. Hu ◽  
Q.-D. Wang ◽  
Y. Xu ◽  
M.-M. Zhang

Many studies showed the differences in subjective response to sexual stimuli between heterosexual and homosexual men. However, the underlying neurobiological factors of sexual orientation are largely unknown. We addressed the question what is the major attribution of the expected differences in brain activation, i.e. neural circuits or different cognitive process. Twenty-eight healthy male volunteers, 14 heterosexuals and 14 homosexuals, were scanned by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging while subjects were viewing different types of stimuli, i.e. heterosexual couple stimuli (HCS), gay couple stimuli (GCS), lesbian couple stimuli (LCS) and neutral stimuli (NS). SPM02 was used for data analysis. Rating of sexual attractiveness was assessed. Subjective sexual arousal was induced by HCS and GCS in heterosexual and homosexual men, respectively. And sexual disgust was induced by GCS and LCS in heterosexual and homosexual men, respectively. As compared to viewing NS, viewing sexual stimuli induced significant different brain activations most of which had characteristic for cognitive process. These observations suggested that different cognitive pattern was major attribution of different subjective response to sexual stimuli between heterosexual and homosexual men.

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1628-1634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Ponseti ◽  
Oliver Granert ◽  
Olav Jansen ◽  
Stephan Wolff ◽  
Hubertus Mehdorn ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori A. Brotto ◽  
Darlynne Gehring ◽  
Carolin Klein ◽  
Boris B Gorzalka ◽  
Sydney Thomson ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
S-H Hu ◽  
Q-D Wang ◽  
Y Xu ◽  
Z-L Liao ◽  
L-J Xu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Franklin Soler ◽  
Reina Granados ◽  
Ana I. Arcos-Romero ◽  
Cristóbal Calvillo ◽  
Ana Álvarez-Muelas ◽  
...  

Psychological-psychiatric factors have a different effect on sexual functioning in men and women. This research aimed to examine the association between psychopathological dimensions and dimensions of sexual functioning in Spanish young adults in two studies. Study 1 examined sexual functioning and psychopathological dimensions in 700 women and 516 men. Study 2 conducted an experimental laboratory task to evaluate subjective sexual arousal and genital sensations when watching visual sexual stimuli in a subsample of participants from Study 1 (143 women and 123 men). As a result, the first study showed that depression and anxiety-related symptoms had a negative effect, both in men and women, and having a partner had a positive influence on the dimensions of sexual functioning. The second study showed that anxiety symptoms were positively associated with subjective sexual arousal in both men and women, and anxiety was associated with the assessment of genital sensations in men. The differences between the results of anxiety may be explained because sexual arousal was evaluated in general terms in Study 1, whereas it was evaluated as a state in Study 2. These findings confirm that the presence of psychopathological symptoms contributes to sexual functioning, as well as the necessity of strengthening mental illness prevention programs that include sexual health components.


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 726-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Paul ◽  
Boris Schiffer ◽  
Thomas Zwarg ◽  
Tillmann H.C. Krüger ◽  
Sherif Karama ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Hamann ◽  
Rebecca A Herman ◽  
Carla L Nolan ◽  
Kim Wallen

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2720-2737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sina Wehrum‐Osinsky ◽  
Tim Klucken ◽  
Sabine Kagerer ◽  
Bertram Walter ◽  
Andrea Hermann ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. e20210004
Author(s):  
Nina Micanovic ◽  
Amanda D. Timmers ◽  
Meredith L. Chivers

Marked differences have been found in men’s and women’s sexual response patterns, contingent upon their sexual orientation; androphilic (attracted to men) and gynephilic (attracted to women) men demonstrate greatest genital and self-reported arousal to their preferred stimulus type (a “gender-specific” response), whereas androphilic women do not, and findings for gynephilic women have been mixed. While there have been many investigations into gynephilic men’s and androphilic women’s (i.e., heterosexual men/women) sexual response, there has been less investigation into the specificity of sexual response of androphilic men and gynephilic women. Given the complex nature of sexual stimuli that are used in sexual response research, it is often unclear to what extent contextual cues (e.g., cues other than the sexual actor’s primary and secondary sex characteristics, such as physical attractiveness, sexual activity, etc.) influence participants’ sexual response patterns. As such, the current study examined genital, discrete self-reported, and continuous self-reported responses of androphilic men ( n = 22) and gynephilic women ( n = 10) to prepotent sexual features (stimuli thought to elicit automatic sexual arousal: erect penises and exposed vulvas), non-prepotent sexual features (flaccid penises and pubic triangles) and neutral stimuli (clothed men and women). Both samples exhibited a gender-specific pattern of genital, self-reported, and continuous self-reported sexual arousal. Similarly, all measures of sexual arousal were generally found to be greatest to “prepotent” sexual cues. Implications for understanding gender specificity of sexual response are discussed.


1969 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack D. Hain ◽  
Patrick H. Linton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document