Empirical comparison of alternative stochastic volatility option pricing models: Evidence from Korean KOSPI 200 index options market

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Joon Kim ◽  
Sol Kim
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-205
Author(s):  
Young Ho Eom ◽  
Woon Wook Jang

This paper investigates empirically the modelling issues for the stochastic processes underlying KOSPI200 index options. Empirical results show that we need to incorporate two factor stochastic volatility processes to have a good option pricing performance. However, the number of the leverage channel is not an important issue for the modelling of the KOSPI200 index options. Our results also show that the models with finite activity large jumps outperform that with infinite activity small jumps for the financial crisis period. On the while, for the pre-crisis period, there is no clear superiority or inferiority between both jumps models.


Author(s):  
Przemyslaw S. Stilger ◽  
Ngoc Quynh Anh Nguyen ◽  
Tri Minh Nguyen

This paper examines the empirical performance of four stochastic volatility option pricing models: Heston, Heston[Formula: see text], Bates and Heston–Hull–White. To compare these models, we use individual stock options data from January 1996 to August 2014. The comparison is made with respect to pricing and hedging performance, implied volatility surface and risk-neutral return distribution characteristics, as well as performance across industries and time. We find that the Heston model outperforms the other models in terms of in-sample pricing, whereas Heston[Formula: see text] model outperforms the other models in terms of out-of-sample hedging. This suggests that taking jumps or stochastic interest rates into account does not improve the model performance after accounting for stochastic volatility. We also find that the model performance deteriorates during the crises as well as when the implied volatility surface is steep in the maturity or strike dimension.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-49
Author(s):  
Aparna Prasad Bhat

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to ascertain the effectiveness of major deterministic and stochastic volatility-based option pricing models in pricing and hedging exchange-traded dollar–rupee options over a five-year period since the launch of these options in India.Design/methodology/approachThe paper examines the pricing and hedging performance of five different models, namely, the Black–Scholes–Merton model (BSM), skewness- and kurtosis-adjusted BSM, NGARCH model of Duan, Heston’s stochastic volatility model and anad hocBlack–Scholes (AHBS) model. Risk-neutral structural parameters are extracted by calibrating each model to the prices of traded dollar–rupee call options. These parameters are used to generate out-of-sample model option prices and to construct a delta-neutral hedge for a short option position. Out-of-sample pricing errors and hedging errors are compared to identify the best-performing model. Robustness is tested by comparing the performance of all models separately over turbulent and tranquil periods.FindingsThe study finds that relatively simpler models fare better than more mathematically complex models in pricing and hedging dollar–rupee options during the sample period. This superior performance is observed to persist even when comparisons are made separately over volatile periods and tranquil periods. However the more sophisticated models reveal a lower moneyness-maturity bias as compared to the BSM model.Practical implicationsThe study concludes that incorporation of skewness and kurtosis in the BSM model as well as the practitioners’ approach of using a moneyness-maturity-based volatility within the BSM model (AHBS model) results in better pricing and hedging effectiveness for dollar–rupee options. This conclusion has strong practical implications for market practitioners, hedgers and regulators in the light of increased volatility in the dollar–rupee pair.Originality/valueExisting literature on this topic has largely centered around either US equity index options or options on major liquid currencies. While many studies have solely focused on the pricing performance of option pricing models, this paper examines both the pricing and hedging performance of competing models in the context of Indian currency options. Robustness of findings is tested by comparing model performance across periods of stress and tranquility. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is one of the first comprehensive studies to focus on an emerging market currency pair such as the dollar–rupee.


2017 ◽  
Vol 04 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 1750024
Author(s):  
Elham Dastranj ◽  
Roghaye Latifi

Option pricing under two stochastic volatility models, double Heston model and double Heston with three jumps, is done. Firstly, the efficiency of the second model is shown via FFT method, and numerical examples using power call options. Then it is shown that power option yields more premium income under the second model, double Heston with three jumps, than another one.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document