1721 Multidisciplinary clinical decision making in colorectal cancer teams: A mixed method, multi stage investigation into the contribution of the clinical nurse specialist within the multidisciplinary team meeting

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. S255 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Carballo ◽  
G. Robert ◽  
C. Taylor
The Analyst ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nana Lyu ◽  
Vinoth Kumar Rajendran ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Alexander Engel ◽  
Mark P. Molloy ◽  
...  

The molecular diagnosis of KRAS mutations has become crucial for clinical decision-making in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatments. Currently, the common methods for detecting mutations are based on quantitative PCR, DNA...


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin W Lamb ◽  
Paula Allchorne ◽  
Nick Sevdalis ◽  
Charles Vincent ◽  
James SA Green

2021 ◽  
pp. 1192-1199
Author(s):  
Gianluca Mauri ◽  
Erika Durinikova ◽  
Alessio Amatu ◽  
Federica Tosi ◽  
Andrea Cassingena ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1327-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Schroy ◽  
Sarah E. Caron ◽  
Bonnie J. Sherman ◽  
Timothy C. Heeren ◽  
Tracy A. Battaglia

Author(s):  
Bill Fulford

AbstractThis chapter introduces Part III of the book. Contributing chapters illustrate the role of a culturally enriched form of values-based practice in building best practice in the design and delivery of contemporary mental health services. Topics covered from the model of values-based practice set out in chapter ‘Surprised by Values: An Introduction to Values-Based Practice and the Use of Personal Narratives in this Book’ include, person-values-centred care, the extended multidisciplinary team, shared clinical decision-making supported by dissensus within frameworks of shared values, and recovery practice. The bottom-line message is that incorporated into values-based practice, cultural values cease to operate as barriers to, and instead become effective vectors of, best practice in mental health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document