19.6 Persons with chronic low back pain (LBP)demonstrate reduced sagittal plane joint torques in response to surface translations

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S122
Author(s):  
S.L. Jones ◽  
S.M. Henry ◽  
C.C. Raasch ◽  
J.R. Hitt ◽  
J.Y. Bunn
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Joint Torques ◽  
Plane Joint

scholarly journals Effect of Medicinal Cannabis Therapy (Mct) On Severity of Chronic Low Back Pain, Sciatica and Lumbar Range of Motion

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Medicinal Cannabis

Background: Anecdotal evidence indicates the possible efficacy of cannabis use as an adjunctive treatment in chronic low back pain. The purpose of the current study was to assess the results of treatment of patients suffering from chronic low back pain by medicinal cannabis (MCT). Methods: A cohort of 46 patients was followed for a minimum of twelve months. They were evaluated at baseline prior to MCT, 3 months later when MCT was begun and up to 12 months of MCT by patient reported outcome questionnaire (SF-12), visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), back specific function was assessed using the Oswestry score, range of motion was measured using the Saunders digital inclinometer. Opiate use was assessed using pharmacy dispensation records at baseline and after 12 months of MCT. Inclusion criteria included: age over 25 years, sciatica with documented treatment for at least 12 months, evidence on CT or MRI scan of disc herniation or spinal stenosis, failure of at least two narcotic drugs, and consent to use medicinal cannabis. Exclusion criteria included evidence of bone cancer, evidence of diabetic neuropathy, and evidence of prior psychotic reactions. Treatment protocol: Cannabis usage was at a fixed dosage of 20 grams per month, dose increase was considered at least after 6 months of treatment. The cannabis was smoked at a recommended rate of 4 dosages per day. Results: After 12 months of MCT BPI VAS decreased from 8.4 ± 1.4 to 2.0 ± 2.0; SF12-PCS improved from 47 ± 14 to 55 ± 12; SF12-MCS improved from 44 ± 6 to 50 ± 10; and sagittal plane active range of motion improved from 34º ± 8º degrees to 48º ± 8º, In conclusion, short term usage of smoked medicinal cannabis appear to improve both physical and mental function while decreasing pain levels of chronic low back pain sufferers.

scholarly journals 77 Comparison between Swiss Ball Exercise and Sling Exercise on Lumbar Stability and Postural Stability in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv18-iv27
Author(s):  
Apinkarn Jaroenlarp ◽  
Pitsinee Fuengjit ◽  
Jirapat Sukeeyuti ◽  
Parichart Sophap ◽  
Chadarat Chirasaengthong
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Functional Disability ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Postural Sway ◽  
Neuromuscular Control ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objective This study was to comparison of level of lumbar stability and postural sway in sagittal plane and coronal plane between exercise with ball and sling in the patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). Methodology Twenty participants with NCLBP aged 20 to 55 years were randomly divided into exercise with ball group (BG) and exercise with sling group (SG). Both groups performed 8 exercise sessions; two times per week for four weeks. The visual analog scale (VAS), modified oswestry disability questionnaire (MODQ), modified isometric stability test (MIST) were used to measure at baseline, week 2 and week 4 after exercise. Moreover, the sway area and sway velocity were evaluated at before and after training. Both group performed exercise 15 repetitions per set for 3 sets with 1-minute resting between set. A repeated two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the difference variables between both groups. Results The results showed significant difference between pre and post treatment of pain intensity, functional disability, MIST and postural sway in both groups (p<.001). When compared between both groups, the reduction in all parameters for the BG group was significantly higher than the SG group (p<.05). Moreover, the findings represented that the postural sway in both sagittal and coronal plane showed no significant difference between both groups after complete treatment. Conclusion The core stabilization exercise with ball and with sling can provided reduction of pain and functional disability. Moreover, the BG group is more effective for decreasing of pain, disability and improving of lumbar stability may described by greater perturbation of the ball. During perform exercise on ball bring to unstable and increasing of neuromuscular control. These results can applied to clinical practice for choosing the appropriate exercise program in the patients with NCLBP.

scholarly journals Correlation between Trunk-Pelvis Inter-Segmental Coordination Parameters during Walking and Disability Level in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ebrahimi ◽  
F Kamali ◽  
M Razeghi ◽  
S A Haghpanah
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Relative Phase ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Coordination Pattern ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Segmental Coordination ◽  
Disability Level

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) disability has been particularly frustrating because its treatment has been a great therapeutic challenge. Disability has been suggested to depend on different factors that should be found and considered in the medical management. The inter-segmental coordination is often impaired in CLBP subjects; however, to the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence about the relationship between the existence of coordination problems and disability in CLBP patients.Objective: To evaluate the correlation between sagittal plane trunk-pelvis inter-segmental coordination parameters during walking and disability level in CLBP patients.Methods: Kinematic data were collected from 16 non-specific CLBP (18-40 years) volunteers during walking. Sagittal plane time-normalized segmental angles and velocities were used to calculate continuous relative phase for each data point. Coordination parameters, mean absolute relative phase (MARP) and deviation phase (DP) were derived to quantify the trunk-pelvis coordination pattern and variability during gait cycles, respectively. The disability level was quantified through Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to find the probable correlation between coordination parameters and disability level.Results: The analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between sagittal plane MARP or DP and disability level (%ODI) in CLBP subjects during walking (r= -0.806 P<0.001 and r= -0.856, P<0.001, respectively).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the lower the MARP (more in-phase pattern) and DP (less variable pattern) in the CLBP subjects, the more disability existing in such patients. The results suggest that clinicians should look beyond pain management when prescribing rehabilitation for CLBP and consider interventions that target segmental coordination improvement to manage CLBP induced disability.

scholarly journals Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Have an Individual Movement Signature: A Comparison of Angular Amplitude, Angular Velocity and Muscle Activity Across Multiple Functional Tasks

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Christe ◽  
Camille Aussems ◽  
Brigitte M. Jolles ◽  
Julien Favre
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Movement Behavior ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Spinal Movement ◽  
Angular Amplitude

Despite a large body of evidence demonstrating spinal movement alterations in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), there is still a lack of understanding of the role of spinal movement behavior on LBP symptoms development or recovery. One reason for this may be that spinal movement has been studied during various functional tasks without knowing if the tasks are interchangeable, limiting data consolidation steps. The first objective of this cross-sectional study was to analyze the influence of the functional tasks on the information carried by spinal movement measures. To this end, we first analyzed the relationships in spinal movement between various functional tasks in patients with CLBP using Pearson correlations. Second, we compared the performance of spinal movement measures to differentiate patients with CLBP from asymptomatic controls among tasks. The second objective of the study was to develop task-independent measures of spinal movement and determine the construct validity of the approach. Five functional tasks primarily involving sagittal-plane movement were recorded for 52 patients with CLBP and 20 asymptomatic controls. Twelve measures were used to describe the sagittal-plane angular amplitude and velocity at the lower and upper lumbar spine as well as the activity of the erector spinae. Correlations between tasks were statistically significant in 91 out of 99 cases (0.31 ≤ r ≤ 0.96, all p &lt; 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) to differentiate groups did not differ substantially between tasks in most of the comparisons (82% had a difference in AUC of ≤0.1). The task-independent measures of spinal movement demonstrated equivalent or higher performance to differentiate groups than functional tasks alone. In conclusion, these findings support the existence of an individual spinal movement signature in patients with CLBP, and a limited influence of the tasks on the information carried by the movement measures, at least for the twelve common sagittal-plane measures analysed in this study. Therefore, this work brought critical insight for the interpretation of data in literature reporting differing tasks and for the design of future studies. The results also supported the construct validity of task-independent measures of spinal movement and encouraged its consideration in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document