P104 Gait analysis of patients with hemiplegia using power spectrum of ground reaction force: difference between with and without ankle — foot orthosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S112-S113
Author(s):  
E. Sangsoo
Author(s):  
Mizuki Kato ◽  
Arinori Kamono ◽  
Naomichi Ogihara

An ankle-foot orthosis is often prescribed in the rehabilitation of patients with neurological motor disorders such as hemiparesis. However, walking with a unilateral ankle-foot orthosis may not be effectively achieved just by trying to reproduce normal intact walking with a symmetrical gait pattern. Understanding skills to facilitate walking gait with a unilateral ankle-foot orthosis has implications for better rehabilitative interventions to help restore walking ability in patients with stroke. We, therefore, analyzed the kinematics and ground reaction forces of walking with and without an ankle-foot orthosis in healthy subjects to infer the possible skills to facilitate walking gait with a unilateral ankle-foot orthosis. Adult male participants were asked to walk with and without an ankle-foot orthosis across two force platforms set in a wooden walkway, and body kinematics and ground reaction force profiles in the sagittal plane were simultaneously recorded. We found that the forward tilting angle of the trunk at the time of toe-off of the leg with the ankle-foot orthosis was significantly larger than that of the leg without the ankle-foot orthosis, to adaptively compensate for the loss of ankle joint mobility due to the unilateral ankle-foot orthosis. Furthermore, the peak vertical ground reaction force at heel-contact was significantly larger in the leg without the ankle-foot orthosis than in the leg with the ankle-foot orthosis owing to the fact that the stance phase duration of the leg with the ankle-foot orthosis was relatively shorter. Such information may potentially be applied to facilitate walking training in stroke patients wearing a unilateral ankle-foot orthosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 177-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Giuseppe Contini ◽  
Elena Bergamini ◽  
Martina Alvini ◽  
Eugenio Di Stanislao ◽  
Giuseppe Di Rosa ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Saeedi ◽  
Mohammad E Mousavi ◽  
Basir Majddoleslam ◽  
Mehdi Rahgozar ◽  
Gholamreza Aminian ◽  
...  

Background:Due to blocking of pronation/dorsiflexion in flexible flat foot and restriction of these movements in using the University of California Berkeley Laboratory orthosis, provided pressures in sole by the orthosis were increased. Therefore, this article describes the evaluation of modified foot orthosis with flexible structure in the management of individuals with flexible flat foot.Case description and method:The patient was a 21-year-old male who had symptomatic flat foot. The modified foot orthosis included movable surface and the outside structure. The modified foot orthosis was evaluated by standing foot X-ray, comfort rate, electromyography of leg muscle and vertical ground reaction force during walking.Findings and outcomes:The modified foot orthosis improved the foot alignment and decreased the symptoms of flat foot with more comfort. Subtalar position by sub-maximum supination had higher position than neutral in sagittal plane. It may increase the muscle activity of peroneus longus by 7% compared to barefoot, and there was a decrease of 11% ground reaction force in mid stance.Conclusion:The result of this single case evaluation only proposed the feasibility of this modified insole as the orthotic treatment in flexible flat foot.Clinical relevanceThe modified foot orthosis, which is mobile in the midfoot, is an orthosis for walking and standing in subjects with flexible flat foot.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumiko Yamamoto ◽  
Naoki Tomokiyo ◽  
Tadashi Yasui ◽  
Toshikazu Kawaguchi

Background: An ankle-foot orthosis with an oil damper was previously developed to assist the first rocker function during gait, but the effects of the amount of resistive moment generated on gait have not been clarified. Objectives: To measure the amount of resistive moment generated by the ankle-foot orthosis with an oil damper during gait and determine its effect on the gait of patients with stroke. Study Design: Preliminary cross-sectional study. Methods: The gait of four patients with stroke in the chronic phase was measured in four conditions: without an ankle-foot orthosis and with the ankle-foot orthosis with an oil damper generating three different amounts of resistive moment. Measurements were taken with a three-dimensional motion analysis system and a specially designed device to determine the resistive moment. Results: The resistive moment was observed in the former half in stance of the paretic limb, and its magnitude was less than 10 N m. Some gait parameters related to terminal stance and preswing were affected by the amount of resistive moment. The forward component of floor reaction force and the shank vertical angle showed peak values when the patients reported feeling most comfortable during gait. Conclusion: Although the resistive moment generated by the ankle-foot orthosis with an oil damper was small, it was sufficient to alter gait. Clinical relevance To maximize the effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses, it is necessary to know the effects of resistive moment on the gait of patients with stroke. The ankle-foot orthosis with an oil damper assists the first rocker function in gait and also affects the gait in a later phase in stance. The peak values of some gait parameters coincided with patients reporting gait to be most comfortable. It is important to know that ankle-foot orthosis with an oil damper assistance in the first rocker alters the weight acceptance on the paretic limb and affects the gait parameters related to propulsion ability in stance.


2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica C. Böpple ◽  
Michael Tanner ◽  
Sarah Campos ◽  
Christian Fischer ◽  
Sebastian Müller ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ankle fractures are common fractures in trauma surgery. Several studies have compared gait patterns between affected patients and control groups. However, no one used the Heidelberg Foot Measurement Method in combination with statistical parametric mapping of the entire gait cycle in this patient cohort. We sought to identify possible mobility deficits in the tibio-talar joint and medial arch in patients after ankle fractures as a sign of stiffness and pain that could result in a pathological gait pattern. We focused on the tibio-talar flexion as it is the main movement in the tibio-talar joint. Moreover, we examined the healing progress over time. Methods Fourteen patients with isolated ankle fractures were included prospectively. A gait analysis using the Heidelberg Foot Measurement Method was performed 9 and 26 weeks after surgery to analyse the tibio-talar dorsal flexion, the foot tibia dorsal flexion, the subtalar inversion and the medial arch as well as the cadence, the walking speed and the ground reaction force. The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score was used to obtain clinical data. Results were compared to those from 20 healthy participants. Furthermore, correlations between the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot score and the results of the gait analysis were evaluated. Results Statistical parametric mapping showed significant differences for the Foot Tibia Dorsal Flexion for patients after 9 weeks (53–75%: p = 0.001) and patients after 26 weeks (58–70%: p = 0.011) compared to healthy participants, respectively. Furthermore, significant differences regarding the tibio-talar dorsal flexion for patients 9 weeks after surgery (15–40%: p < 0.001; 56,5–70%: p = 0.007; 82–88%: p = 0.033; 97–98,5%: p = 0.048) as well as patients after 26 weeks (62,5–65%: p = 0.049) compared to healthy participants, respectively. There were no significant differences looking at the medial arch and the subtalar inversion. Moreover, significant differences regarding the ground reaction force were found for patients after 9 weeks (0–17%: p < 0.001; 21–37%: p < 0.001; 41–54%: p < 0.001; 60–64%: p = 0.013) as well as patients after 26 weeks (0–1,5%: p = 0.046; 5–15%: p < 0.001; 27–33%: p = 0.001; 45–49%: p = 0.005; 57–59%: p = 0.049) compared to healthy participants, respectively. In total, the range of motion in the tibio-talar joint and the medial arch was reduced in affected patients compared to healthy participants. Patients showed significant increase of the range of motion between 9 and 26 weeks. Conclusions This study shows, that patients affected by ankle fractures show limited mobility in the tibio-talar joint and the medial arch when compared to healthy participants. Even though the limitation of motion remains at least over a period of 26 weeks, a significant increase can be recognized over time. Furthermore, if we look at the absolute values, the patients’ values tend to get closer to those of the control group. Trial registration This study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023379).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document