A direct theory of affine rods

2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Nardinocchi ◽  
Luciano Teresi ◽  
Alessandro Tiero
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER HUGHES CONN

AbstractIn this article I object to Le Poidevin's (2009) contention that relative identity is beset with an infinite metaphysical regress. I argue, first, that since Le Poidevin's regress argument presupposes a direct theory of reference, it does not apply to accounts of relative identity which reject this account of reference. I argue, second, that Le Poidevin's regress is not inevitable for one who accepts a direct account of reference, since it does not apply to the formal logic of relative identity which van Inwagen uses to articulate and defend the mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation.


1988 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 311-317
Author(s):  
G. J. F. Smets ◽  
P. J. Stappers ◽  
B. J. A. Kröse

Does form discrimination rely on feature analysis, as the indirect theory of perception supposes, or on affordances (behavioural meanings specified by invariant patterns), as direct theory states. Subjects were to indicate the position of a target in a perspective rendering of a plane, displayed for 100 msec. in a large screen projection. In one of the conditions the target disrupted the plane, in the other it did not. Although targets of the two conditions shared the same features, the disruptive targets were discriminated more often than the nondisruptive targets. This result supports the direct approach to perception which states that a perceiver discriminates behaviourally relevant patterns rather than geometrical properties.


2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 865-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Nardinocchi ◽  
L. Teresi ◽  
A. Tiero
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 970-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Koning ◽  
M. B. Chadwick

Perception ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Katz

According to Gibson's direct theory, perception is an achievement, not a process. Perceptual error, therefore, is the failure to perceive. Taken in isolation, this assertion leads to implausible consequences, but taken together with other assertions of Gibson, it may be understood, without contradiction, to mean that there is no absolute error in perception. Whether perception is successful or not is determined by the context in which the perceptual act occurs.


1995 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 753-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lippmann

A review of the present approaches to Cosserat plasticity and to its applications is presented, in comparison with the direct Theory of the Plastic Spin. In both theories, the classical rigid-plastic continuum with stress and strain rate as principal field quantities is generalized to also incorporate the relative “Plastic Spin”, ie, the average irreversible rotation of the microstructural elements (“grains” ) in a mesovolume, relative to the rotation induced by the field of point velocities or point displacements. Moreover, the Cosserat plasticity represents a complete, generalized continuum mechanical theory, where also the additional kinematic quantities, ie, the plastic spin and the internal twist are complemented by associate static quantities as, asymmetric stress or couple stress. While the direct Theory of the Plastic Spin is confined to non-isotropic materials, where the average rotation of the grains corresponds also to the rotation of the macrostructure, (texture) the Cosserat approach is also concerned with, and contemporarily even devoted to isotropic media. After presenting a general survey of the literature, experiments carried out with a generalized Couette flow, (for granular or rock-like materials) or in the torsion test, (for metals) are discussed showing that the Plastic Spin is an observable quantity generally different from zero even in an isotropic material. It can be predicted to the same extent, using the Cosserat plasticity as using any one of the much more complicated theories of crystal plasticity.


1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 967-973
Author(s):  
P. E. Hodgson ◽  
P. Demetriou ◽  
S. S. Dimitrova

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document