A Framework for the Systematic Design of Hybrid Separation Processes

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Marquardt ◽  
Sven Kossack ◽  
Korbinian Kraemer
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suksun Amornraksa ◽  
Ittipat Subsaipin ◽  
Lida Simasatitkul ◽  
Suttichai Assabumrungrat

Abstract Separation process is very crucial in bioethanol production as it consumes the highest energy in the process. Unlike other works, this research systematically designed a suitable separation process for bioethanol production from corn stover by using thermodynamic insight. Two separation processes, i.e., extractive distillation (case 2) and pervaporation (case 3), were developed and compared with conventional molecular sieve (case 1). Process design and simulation were done by using Aspen Plus program. The process evaluation was done not only in terms of energy consumption and process economics but also in terms of environmental impacts. It was revealed that pervaporation is the best process in all aspects. Its energy consumption and carbon footprint are 60.8 and 68.34% lower than case 1, respectively. Its capital and production costs are also the lowest, 37.0 and 9.88% lower than case 1.


2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (25) ◽  
pp. 8319-8328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Lucia ◽  
Amit Amale ◽  
Ross Taylor

SPARK ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Skiborowski ◽  
Andrzej Górak

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1124-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katalin Koczka ◽  
Peter Mizsey ◽  
Zsolt Fonyo

AbstractHybrid separation processes are becoming more and more important in the practice if membrane technologies are also involved. In this work, a systematic investigation is completed for three sequence alternatives of distillation and pervaporation. These are the following: pervaporation followed with distillation (PV+D), distillation followed with pervaporation (D+PV), two distillation columns and a pervaporation unit between them (D+PV+D). The hybrid separation process alternatives are evaluated with rigorous modelling tools, but first, a rigorous simulation algorithm is determined for the pervaporation. The three hybrid separation processes are rigorously modelled with CHEMCAD, and optimized with the dynamic programming optimization method for the case of the separation of ethanol-water mixture. The objective function is the total annual cost (TAC). The energy consumption is also investigated. The selection of the ethanol-water mixture has two motivations: (i) it is quite often studied and well known, and (ii) to make biofuel (ethanol) production more economical, membrane technologies might also be applied. The results are compared with each other and with the classical separation completed with heteroazeotropic distillation. The optimized TAC shows that the distillation column followed with pervaporation is the most economical hybrid separation process alternative. Its TAC is about 66% of that of the classical separation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document