scholarly journals PMS63 EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY AND CONTENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS PATIENT EDUCATION INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. A134
Author(s):  
S Gutlapally ◽  
D Bhere ◽  
VRR Paide ◽  
K Gnanasam
Spine ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. E185-E188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. Ullrich ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoë Meleo-Erwin ◽  
Corey Basch ◽  
Joseph Fera ◽  
Danna Ethan ◽  
Philip Garcia

Background: Web-based patient education literature has been shown to be written at reading levels far above what is recommended. Little is known about the overall readability of current internet-based bariatric surgery information. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of current bariatric material on the internet. Methods: The term "weight loss surgery" was searched using the Chrome browser on the first 15pages of URLs that appeared with content written in English. Using five readability measures, scores were generated using Readable.io for written content on a sample of 96 websites. Scores were sorted into the readability categories of "easy," "average," and "difficult." Results: Almost 93% of websites, both .com and .org, sampled received an unacceptable readability score on each assessment. Conclusion: Accurate and appropriate information about bariatric procedures is critical for patient comprehension and adherence to recommended protocols.


2004 ◽  
Vol 421 ◽  
pp. 50-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara D Rozental ◽  
David J Bozentka ◽  
Pedro K Beredjiklian

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Salo ◽  
Carlos Perez ◽  
Robert Lavery ◽  
Aditya Malankar ◽  
Marc Borenstein ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
FM Brooks ◽  
H Lawrence ◽  
A Jones ◽  
MJH McCarthy

Introduction YouTube™ contains more than 60% of all videos on the internet. Its popularity has increased, and it has now become a source of patient education and information. It is unregulated for the quality of its videos. This project was designed to assess the quality of videos on YouTube™ on lumbar discectomy. Methods A systematic search of YouTube™ was performed. The search terms used were ‘lumbar’ and ‘discectomy’. The first ten pages were reviewed. Information was recorded relating to the date of publishing, the publisher and the number of viewings. The content was reviewed using criteria based on recommendations from the British Association of Spine Surgeons website. Content was assessed and points were awarded for information relating to management options, description of the procedure (including anaesthetic, likely recovery and outcome) and complications as well as information relating to the author and his or her institute. An overall rating of ‘inadequate’, ‘poor’, ‘average’ or ‘good’ was given. Results Overall, 81 videos were identified. The total number of viewings was 2,722,964 (range: 139–111,891), with an average number of 34,037 viewings per video. There were 16 with a rating of ‘good’, 25 with a rating of ‘average’ and 40 with a rating of ‘poor’ or ‘inadequate’. The most common missing information related to anaesthesia or complications. Most videos (69/81) were broadcast by surgeons or surgical institutes. Conclusions The quality of YouTube™ videos is variable and we believe this represents the unregulated nature of broadcasts on YouTube™. Thought should be given to information in videos prior to placement.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Rosenbaum ◽  
Scott J. Ellis

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-461-S-462
Author(s):  
Perjohan Lindfors ◽  
Magnus Simren ◽  
Hans Törnblom ◽  
Gisela Ringström ◽  
Stine Störsrud ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 215-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie H. Nicoll

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document