Parametric study of an energy efficient air conditioning system using liquid desiccant

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan A. Kinsara ◽  
Omar M. Al-Rabghi ◽  
Moustafa M. Elsayed
1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 791-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan A. Kinsara ◽  
Moustafa M. Elsayed ◽  
Omar M. Al-Rabghi

Energy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 180-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Yinglin ◽  
Zhang Xiaosong ◽  
Tan Laizai ◽  
Zhang Zhongbin ◽  
Wu Wei ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 493 ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
Y.A. Sabtalistia ◽  
S.N.N. Ekasiwi ◽  
B. Iskandriawan

Energy consumption for air conditioning systems (air conditioning system) increased along with the increasing need for fresh air and comfortable in the room especially apartments. FAC system (Floor Air Conditioning) is growing because it is more energy efficient than CAC (Ceiling Air Conditioning) system. However, the position of the AC supply is on the lower level at the FAC system causes draft discomfort becomes greater as air supply closer to the occupants so that thermal comfort can be reduced. Heat mixture of windows, exterior walls, kitchen, and occupants in the studio apartment affect thermal comfort in the room too.This study aims to determine the position of the AC supply which has the best thermal comfort of FAC system in the studio apartment. It can be done by analyzing ADPI (Air Diffusion Performance Index), the distribution of air temperature, wind speed, RH (Relative Humidity), and DR (Draft Risk) to change the position of the AC supply supported by CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulation.This result prove that AC position 2 (on wall near the kitchen) is more comfortable than AC position 1 (on the bathroom wall) because AC position 2 away from occupied areas, thereby reducing the occurrence of draught discomfort.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document