413 PREDICTION OF PERINEURAL INVASION AND ITS PROGNOSTIC VALUE IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
H.K. Ha ◽  
S.S. Lee ◽  
W. Lee ◽  
J.Z. Lee ◽  
S.D. Lee ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Taik Lee ◽  
Seungsoo Lee ◽  
Chang Jin Yun ◽  
Byung Joo Jeon ◽  
Jung Man Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 630-635
Author(s):  
Peter Ström ◽  
Tobias Nordström ◽  
Brett Delahunt ◽  
Hema Samaratunga ◽  
Henrik Grönberg ◽  
...  

AimsDespite being one of the major pathways for the spread of malignant tumours, perineural invasion (PNI) has not conclusively been shown to have an independent prognostic value for prostate cancer. Prostatic biopsy constitutes the major pathology workload in prostate cancer and is the foundation for primary treatment decisions and for this reason we aimed to estimate the prognostic value of PNI in biopsies.MethodsWe followed 918 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) from the prospective and population based STHLM3 study until biochemical recurrence with a median follow-up of 4.1 years. To strengthen the evidence, we combined the estimates from the largest studies targeting the prognostic value of PNI in the biopsy. We also estimated the OR of advanced stage as radical prostatectomy for PNI positive and negative men.ResultsThe estimated prognostic value based on our data suggested an approximately 50% increased risk of biochemical recurrence if PNI was present in the biopsy (p=0.06). Even though not statistically significant on the 5% level, this estimate is consistent with similar studies, and by combining the estimates there is in fact strong evidence in support of an independent prognostic value of PNI in the biopsy (p<0.0001). There was also an independent increased risk of advanced stage at RP for positive men (OR 1.85, p=0.005).ConclusionsThe evidence supporting a clinically relevant and independent prognostic value of PNI is strong enough to be considered for pathology reporting guidelines.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 113-113
Author(s):  
W. Marie Campana ◽  
Jessica Wang-Rodriguez ◽  
Daniel A. Nachtsheim ◽  
Ann Rearden

Author(s):  
Cécile Manceau ◽  
Gaëlle Fromont-Hankard ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Beauval ◽  
Marine Lesourd ◽  
Christophe Almeras ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S1117-S1118
Author(s):  
M. Miszczyk ◽  
Ł. Magrowski ◽  
J. Rembak-Szynkiewicz ◽  
P. Rajwa ◽  
A. Namysł-Kaletka ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 967-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Van den Broeck ◽  
Roderick C.N. van den Bergh ◽  
Nicolas Arfi ◽  
Tobias Gross ◽  
Lisa Moris ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo De Franco ◽  
Daniele Marrelli ◽  
Costantino Voglino ◽  
Carla Vindigni ◽  
Francesco Ferrara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 5125-5129
Author(s):  
Anandia Putriyuni ◽  
Meta Zulyati Oktora

Prostate cancer is the second most common and the fifth leading cause of death by cancer in men worldwide now. The failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer caused by activated androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathways mostly found. The role of AR in growth and progression of prostate cancer is still unclear. Analysis of AR expression in prostate cancer has never been done in West Sumatera. This study aims to determine AR expression of prostate cancer and correlate with Gleason score and perineural invasion. A total of 56 prostate cancer from department of anatomical pathology in West Sumatera. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained slides and paraffin blocks were retrieved. Slides of all cases were evaluated to review Gleason score, histopathological grading, WHO grade group based on ISUP 2014/WHO 2016 and perineural invasion. Androgen receptor immunohistochemistry (IHC) was applied on all cases. High AR expression was the mostly found (51,79%). The mostly prostate cancer is Gleason score 9 (44,64%), histopathological grading poorly differentiated/undifferentiated (76,78%), WHO grade group 5 (48,21%). Perineural invasion was noted in 39,29%. There was significant statistical correlation between AR expression and Gleason score, but no significant correlation with perineural invasion. AR expression is the important marker of prostate cancer progression.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Ding-Wei Ye ◽  
Bo Dai ◽  
Jun-Yu Zhang ◽  
Yun-Yi Kong ◽  
Qi-Feng Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document