PE38: Introduction of a “dedicated prostate surgical planning meeting” increases the frequency of nerve-sparing in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy for prostate cancer while maintaining oncological safety

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
A. Sridhar ◽  
M. Goldstraw ◽  
G. Basnett ◽  
N. Ramachandran ◽  
M. Walkden ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-516
Author(s):  
Carla L. Ellis ◽  
Lara R. Harik ◽  
Cynthia Cohen ◽  
Adeboye O. Osunkoya

Urologic pathology is evolving rapidly. Emerging trends include the expanded diagnostic utility of biomarkers and molecular testing, as well as adapting to the plethora of technical advances occurring in genitourinary oncology, surgical practice, and imaging. We illustrate those trends by highlighting our approach to the diagnostic workup of a few selected disease entities that pathologists may encounter, including newly recognized subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, and prostate cancer, some of which harbor a distinctive chromosomal translocation, gene loss, or mutation. We illustrate applications of immunohistochemistry for differential diagnosis of needle core renal biopsies, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, and amyloidosis and cite encouraging results from early studies using targeted gene expression panels to predict recurrence after prostate cancer surgery. At our institution, pathologists are working closely with urologic surgeons and interventional radiologists to explore the use of intraoperative frozen sections for margins and nerve sparing during robotic prostatectomy, to pioneer minimally invasive videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy, and to refine image-guided needle core biopsies and cryotherapy of prostate cancer as well as blue-light/fluorescence cystoscopy. This collaborative, multidisciplinary approach enhances clinical management and research, and optimizes the care of patients with urologic disorders.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e971
Author(s):  
S.S. Samavedi ◽  
H. Abdul-Muhsin ◽  
P.S.K. Pigilam ◽  
K. Palmer ◽  
G. Ebra ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Vanalia

Abstract Introduction NICE guidelines suggest that PSA, mp-MRI and targeted biopsies should be used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This audit looked at several aspects of prostate cancer assessment and diagnosis at our trust, however we will be focusing on the use of MRI. Method A retrospective cohort study was performed at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals and this included 49 patients. We compared the pre-operative MRI tumour location and tumour grading with post-operative histology tumour location and tumour grading of prostate cancer patients. The statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared testing. Results Prostate tumour location mapping based on MRI was accurate in 70% of the cases, these results were statistically significant (p-value <0.01). However, the tumour grading according to the MRI was only accurate in 45% of the cases (p-value <0.05). Conclusions Tumour grading based on the MRI result should not be routinely used to stratify risk and plan treatment. However, a prostate planning meeting would be recommended prior to the surgery and this can use the MRI location of the tumour along with the patient’s baseline regarding urinary and erectile function to help plan nerve sparing and surgical margins, this would help improve outcomes for patient's post-operative quality of life.


2008 ◽  
pp. 116-122
Author(s):  
Sandhya Rao ◽  
Atsushi Takenaka ◽  
Ashutosh Tewari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document