Most effective immersion treatment for exercise-induced hyperthermia

Author(s):  
Caroline I. Proulx ◽  
Michel B. Ducharme ◽  
Glen P. Kenny
2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 822-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien D. Périard ◽  
Sebastien Racinais ◽  
Martin W. Thompson

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2887-2889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Washington Pires ◽  
Samuel Penna Wanner ◽  
Danusa Dias Soares ◽  
Cândido Celso Coimbra

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pearl M. S. Tan ◽  
Eunice Y. N. Teo ◽  
Noreffendy B. Ali ◽  
Bryan C. H. Ang ◽  
Iswady Iskandar ◽  
...  

Context: Rapid diagnosis and expeditious cooling of individuals with exertional heat stroke is paramount for survival. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of various cooling systems after exercise-induced hyperthermia. Design: Crossover study. Setting: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-two men (age = 24 ± 2 years, height = 1.76 ± 0.07 m, mass = 70.7 ± 9.5 kg) participated. Intervention(s): Each participant completed a treadmill walk until body core temperature reached 39.50°C. The treadmill walk was performed at 5.3 km/h on an 8.5% incline for 50 minutes and then at 5.0 km/h until the end of exercise. Each participant experienced 4 cooling phases in a randomized, repeated-crossover design: (1) no cooling (CON), (2) body-cooling unit (BCU), (3) EMCOOLS Flex.Pad (EC), and (4) ThermoSuit (TS). Cooling continued for 30 minutes or until body core temperature reached 38.00°C, whichever occurred earlier. Main Outcome Measure(s): Body core temperature (obtained via an ingestible telemetric temperature sensor) and heart rate were measured continuously during the exercise and cooling phases. Rating of perceived exertion was monitored every 5 minutes during the exercise phase and thermal sensation every minute during the cooling phase. Results: The absolute cooling rate was greatest with TS (0.16°C/min ± 0.06°C/min) followed by EC (0.12°C/min ± 0.04°C/min), BCU (0.09°C/min ± 0.06°C/min), and CON (0.06°C/min ± 0.02°C/min; P < .001). The TS offered a greater cooling rate than all other cooling modalities in this study, whereas EC offered a greater cooling rate than both CON and BCU (P < .0083 for all). Effect-size calculations, however, showed that EC and BCU were not clinically different. Conclusion: These findings provide objective evidence for selecting the most effective cooling system of those we evaluated for cooling individuals with exercise-induced hyperthermia. Nevertheless, factors other than cooling efficacy need to be considered when selecting an appropriate cooling system.


2013 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason K. W. Lee ◽  
Aldrich C. H. Koh ◽  
Serene X. T. Koh ◽  
Glen J. X. Liu ◽  
Amanda Q. X. Nio ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1389-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Washington Pires ◽  
Christiano E. Veneroso ◽  
Samuel P. Wanner ◽  
Diogo A. S. Pacheco ◽  
Gisele C. Vaz ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S336
Author(s):  
Bruno Lemire ◽  
Daniel Gagnon ◽  
Lucy Dorman ◽  
Ollie Jay ◽  
Glen P. Kenny

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document