P.12.7 ENDOSCOPICALLY REMOVED MALIGNANT POLYPS IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMS. IMPACT OF RE-EVALUATION OF HISTOLOGICAL PARAMETERS

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S163
Author(s):  
R. Fasoli ◽  
P. Cassoni ◽  
D. Di Piramo ◽  
E. Bragantini ◽  
A. Brighenti
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-570
Author(s):  
Esther Toes-Zoutendijk ◽  
Isabel Portillo ◽  
Sarah Hoeck ◽  
Annemieke Opstal-van Winden ◽  
Elisabeth F. Peterse ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alicia Brotons ◽  
Mercedes Guilabert ◽  
Francisco Lacueva ◽  
José Mira ◽  
Blanca Lumbreras ◽  
...  

Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients’ experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient’ experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 190-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mercedes Vanaclocha-Espi ◽  
Josefa Ibáñez ◽  
Ana Molina-Barceló ◽  
Elena Pérez ◽  
Andreu Nolasco ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 1338-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina Armstrong ◽  
Jane J. Kim ◽  
Ethan A. Halm ◽  
Rachel M. Ballard ◽  
Mitchell D. Schnall

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujha Subramanian ◽  
Florence K. L. Tangka ◽  
Sonja Hoover ◽  
Marion Nadel ◽  
Robert Smith ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Nikonov ◽  
V. A. Aksenov ◽  
S. V. Kashin ◽  
N. V. Nekhaikova

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 1075-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedicte Kirkøen ◽  
Paula Berstad ◽  
Edoardo Botteri ◽  
Eirin Dalén ◽  
Jens Nilsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Participants’ experience with a screening test can influence adherence, and therefore the efficacy of screening programs. We compared screening with unsedated flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for participants’ satisfaction with the decision and for willingness to repeat colorectal cancer screening. Methods In a prospective, randomized trial 3257 individuals (50 – 74 years) were invited to either flexible sigmoidoscopy or FIT (1:1), of whom 1650 took up the offer (52.6 %). In total, 1497 screening participants completed at least one questionnaire, either before screening, and/or at three time points in the following year, that measured willingness to repeat screening, willingness to recommend screening, and satisfaction with decision to attend. There were 769 and 728 responders in the flexible sigmoidoscopy and FIT group, respectively. Additionally, 581 flexible sigmoidoscopy participants also completed a pain questionnaire. Results 1 year later, 10 % of the flexible sigmoidoscopy participants were not willing to repeat screening, compared to 5 % of FIT participants. A higher percentage of women compared to men would not repeat flexible sigmoidoscopy screening (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.52, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.48 to 4.28). Notably, 22 % of women reported pain during flexible sigmoidoscopy compared to 5 % of men. When we added pain to the statistical model, pain was significantly associated with unwillingness to repeat flexible sigmoidoscopy (OR 3.15, 95 %CI 1.68 to 5.87), while gender was no longer associated (OR 1.53, 95 %CI 0.82 to 2.88). Conclusion Acceptability for flexible sigmoidoscopy and for FIT was high among Norwegian screening participants, though FIT participants were more willing to repeat screening. Women were less willing to repeat screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy compared to men. This gender difference seemed partly due to pain, and therefore preventable.This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01538550.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document