scholarly journals Compulsory community treatment: beyond randomised controlled trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 949-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feras Ali Mustafa
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Little

Objectives: To explore a contradiction between evidence suggesting community treatment order (CTO) ineffectiveness and clinical experience. Conclusions: The literature pertaining to CTOs actually provides an evidence base for both positions. The headline that three randomised controlled trials and subsequent meta-analyses fail to demonstrate significant differences between groups reflects selection bias. A case may still be made for CTOs.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-251
Author(s):  
Julian Leff

The Thorn Initiative was put together by a group of people, most of whom were researchers who had conducted randomised controlled trials on various kinds of social treatments. Isaac Marks had worked on assertive community treatment (ACT), whereas my experience was in family work for schizophrenia, as was that of Nick Tarrier. In addition, Tarrier had carried out a recent trial of cognitive approaches to reducing delusions and hallucinations. It was rather like trying to turn an assemblage of prima donnas into a chorus, and it is a tribute to the personal qualities of Jim Birley that he succeeded in this seemingly impossible task.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document