Shifting Epistemological Perspectives in Ptolemy’s Harmonics

Author(s):  
Andrew Barker
AERA Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 233285841882094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ee-Seul Yoon ◽  
Kalervo Gulson ◽  
Christopher Lubienski

In this article, we map the expansion of geographic approaches in education policy scholarship in the last two decades. Our main objective is to trace key contributions, illuminating moments and turns from multiple epistemological perspectives within the scholarship of education policy and from the field of (human) geography. In doing so, we discuss how different types of methodological frameworks have developed, contributing to new and innovative geospatial methodologies in recent years. Following that, we note the extent to which the reassertion of critical perspectives into geospatial analyses has affected and could affect education policy and scholarship.


1997 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Israel Galindo

Explicates the differences and similarities between pastoral counseling and spiritual direction and concludes that if pastoral counselors wish to include spiritual direction in their repertoire they need to consider a set of unique epistemological perspectives and a praxis stance often different from the traditional pastoral counseling role.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick E. Savage ◽  
Nori Jacoby ◽  
Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis ◽  
Hideo Daikoku ◽  
Manuel Anglada-Tort ◽  
...  

Global collaborative networks have been established in multiple fields to move beyond research that over-relies on “WEIRD” participants and to consider central questions from cross-cultural and epistemological perspectives. As researchers in music and the social sciences with experience building and sustaining such networks, we participated in a virtual symposium on February 7, 2021. to exchange knowledge, ideas, and recommendations, with an emphasis on developing global networks to investigate human music-making. We present 14 key take-home recommendations, particularly regarding 1) enhancing representation of researchers and research participants, 2) minimizing logistical challenges, 3) ensuring meaningful, reproducible comparisons, and 4) incentivizing sustainable collaboration and shared research practices that circumvent research hierarchies. Two overarching conclusions are that sustainable global collaborations should attempt shared research practices including diverse stake-holders, and that we should fundamentally re-evaluate the nature of research credit attribution.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2-3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Unknown / not yet matched ◽  
Cintia Rodríguez

Abstract Within cognitive and developmental psychology, it is commonly argued that perception is the basis for object concepts. According to this view, sensory experiences would translate into concepts thanks to the recognition, correlation and integration of physical attributes. Once attributes are integrated into general patterns, subjects would become able to parse objects into categories. In this article, we critically review the three epistemological perspectives according to which it can be claimed that object concepts depend on perception: state non-conceptualism, content non-conceptualism, and content conceptualism. We show that the three perspectives have problems that make perception inadequate as a conceptual basis. We suggest that the inquiry about the origin and development of object concepts can benefit from a pragmatic perspective that considers objects’ cultural functions as a conceptual foundation. We address this possibility from the theoretical framework of the pragmatics of the object, considering the importance of objects’ functional permanence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document