Modified bar recursion and classical dependent choice

2017 ◽  
pp. 89-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Berger ◽  
Paulo Oliva
Keyword(s):  
1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas D. Goodman

In this paper we introduce a new notion of realizability for intuitionistic arithmetic in all finite types. The notion seems to us to capture some of the intuition underlying both the recursive realizability of Kjeene [5] and the semantics of Kripke [7]. After some preliminaries of a syntactic and recursion-theoretic character in §1, we motivate and define our notion of realizability in §2. In §3 we prove a soundness theorem, and in §4 we apply that theorem to obtain new information about provability in some extensions of intuitionistic arithmetic in all finite types. In §5 we consider a special case of our general notion and prove a kind of reflection theorem for it. Finally, in §6, we consider a formalized version of our realizability notion and use it to give a new proof of the conservative extension theorem discussed in Goodman and Myhill [4] and proved in our [3]. (Apparently, a form of this result is also proved in Mine [13]. We have not seen this paper, but are relying on [12].) As a corollary, we obtain the following somewhat strengthened result: Let Σ be any extension of first-order intuitionistic arithmetic (HA) formalized in the language of HA. Let Σω be the theory obtained from Σ by adding functionals of finite type with intuitionistic logic, intensional identity, and axioms of choice and dependent choice at all types. Then Σω is a conservative extension of Σ. An interesting example of this theorem is obtained by taking Σ to be classical first-order arithmetic.


2005 ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
ULRICH BERGER ◽  
PAULO OLIVA
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 056011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Namiko Mitarai ◽  
Steen Pedersen

2007 ◽  
Vol 247 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Nevai ◽  
Thomas A. Waite ◽  
Kevin M. Passino

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Qin

AbstractThis article studies and characterizes a family of reference-dependent choice procedures. The decision maker is assumed to compare alternatives with a reference alternative by a single criterion or multiple criteria. The choice set contains all alternatives passing the threshold (set by the reference alternative) in terms of all criteria. Characterizations are provided for variants of such choice procedures.


2003 ◽  
Vol 308 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 259-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Louis Krivine
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 153 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 97-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Seisenberger
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheri Reichelson ◽  
Alexandra Zax ◽  
Ilona Bass ◽  
Andrea Patalano ◽  
Hilary Barth

The partitioning of options into arbitrary categories has been shown to influence decisions about allocating choices or resources among those options; this phenomenon is called “partition dependence.” While we do not call into question the validity of the partition dependence phenomenon in the present work, we do examine the robustness of one of the experimental paradigms reported by Fox, Ratner, and Lieb (2005, Study 4). In three experiments (N = 300) conducted here, participants chose from a menu of perceptually partitioned options (varieties of candy distributed across bowls). We found no clear evidence of partition dependent choice in children (Experiment 1), and no evidence at all of partition dependence in adults’ choices (Experiments 1-3). This was true even when methods were closely matched to those of Fox et al.’s Study 4 (Experiment 3). We conclude that the “candy-bowl” choice task does not reliably elicit partition dependence and propose possible explanations for the discrepancy between these findings and prior reports. Future work will explore the conditions under which partition dependence in consumer choice does reliably arise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document