Prevention: integrating health protection and health promotion perspectives

Author(s):  
Lois E. Tetrick
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorraine M. Wallace ◽  
Jack T. Dennerlein ◽  
Deborah McLellan ◽  
Dean Hashimoto ◽  
Glorian Sorensen

Author(s):  
Mélissa Généreux ◽  
Mathieu Roy ◽  
Tracey O’Sullivan ◽  
Danielle Maltais

In July 2013, a train carrying crude oil derailed in Lac-Mégantic (Canada). This disaster provoked a major fire, 47 deaths, the destruction of 44 buildings, a massive evacuation, and an unparalleled oil spill. Since 2013, Public Health has undertaken several actions to address this challenging situation, using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Community-based surveys were conducted in Lac-Mégantic in 2014, 2015 and 2018. The first two surveys showed persistent and widespread health needs. Inspired by a salutogenic approach, Public Health has shifted its focus from health protection to health promotion. In 2016, a Day of Reflection was organized during which a map of community assets and an action plan for the community recovery were co-constructed with local stakeholders. The creation of an Outreach Team is an important outcome of this collective reflection. This team aims to enhance resilience and adaptive capacity. Several promising initiatives arose from the action plan—all of which greatly contributed to mobilize the community. Interestingly, the 2018 survey suggests that the situation is now evolving positively. This case study stresses the importance of recognizing community members as assets, rather than victims, and seeking a better balance between health protection and health promotion approaches.


1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Chapman Walsh ◽  
Susan E. Jennings ◽  
Thomas Mangione ◽  
Daniel M. Merrigan

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Van Gils ◽  
A W M Suijkerbuijk ◽  
G A de Wit ◽  
J J Polder ◽  
M A Koopmanschap

Abstract Introduction In 2015, Dutch healthcare expenditure exceeded 85 billion euros. But what about prevention? In this study we estimated national expenditure on prevention. A distinction was made between health protection, health promotion and disease prevention. In the estimation of prevention expenditures, this study is limited to universal, selective and indicated prevention, as healthcare-related prevention can hardly be distinguished from curative care. This study analyzed expenditure on preventive activities in the Netherlands in 2015 and took a societal perspective. Methods We used various sources to investigate spending on prevention in 2015. Insofar as costs were part of healthcare expenditure, estimates were based on the Care Accounts of Statistics Netherlands. For the remainder, we estimated expenditure using annual reports and annual accounts of governments and other organizations. We included preventive activities by consumers, industry, NGOs, insurance companies, and government. Results In 2015, an estimated € 12.4 billion (1.8% of the GDP) was spent on prevention: € 2.4 billion on disease prevention (19%), € 0.6 billion on health promotion (5%) and € 9.4 billion on health protection (76%). This is a decrease of 17% compared to 2007, the last year that a similar estimate was made. Within health promotion, the largest expenditure was for working conditions and safety: € 160 million. € 67 million was spent on mental disorders. The largest expenditure item within disease prevention was dental care: € 675 million. Within health protection, this was the sewer by more than € 3 billion. Conclusions Spending on prevention is relatively low compared to total spending on healthcare. The largest part is targeted at health protection. In the coming years there may be an increase in expenditure, due to more governmental prevention policies such as the National Prevention Agreement. Key messages Spending on prevention is relatively low compared to total spending on healthcare. Relatively little money for health protection.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
David R. Austin, PhD

The Health Protection/Health Promotion Model is reviewed and reformulated. The original model had the following two shortcomings: a) it was largely designed for acute illness and therefore did not adequately reflect the needs of clients experiencing chronic illnesses and b) it did not consider the approaches brought on by the positive psychology movement. Thus, the reformulated Health Protection/Health Promotion Model has been altered in two substantive ways. First, it attempts to better reflect the needs of clients with chronic illnesses; second, it has added positive psychology to extend the theoretical foundation of the initial Health Protection/Health Promotion Model.


Asian Survey ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Celeste L. Arrington

Long considered a smoker’s paradise, Japan passed its strictest regulations yet on indoor smoking in 2018 with revisions to the Health Promotion Law and a new ordinance in Tokyo. Timed for the Tokyo Olympics, both reforms made smoking regulations stronger and more legalistic despite reflecting distinctive policy paradigms in their particulars. The national regulations curtailed smoking in many public spaces but accommodated smoking in small restaurants and bars. Tokyo’s stronger restrictions emphasized public health protection by exempting only eateries with no employees. I argue that fully understanding these contemporaneous reforms requires analyzing insider activists: state actors who participated in the tobacco control movement or had sustained interaction with it during earlier reform waves. Case studies drawing on interviews and movement and government documents illustrate the mechanisms insider activists can access because they straddle multiple fields. This article contributes to scholarship about ideas, policy entrepreneurship, and the blurry line between insiders and outsiders in policymaking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document