Folk psychology and theoretical status

1996 ◽  
pp. 105-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Botterill
2008 ◽  
pp. 77-88
Author(s):  
M. Likhachev

The article is devoted to the analysis of methodological problems in using the conception of macroeconomic equilibrium in contemporary economics. The author considers theoretical status and relevance of equilibrium conception and discusses different areas and limits of applicability of the equilibrium theory. Special attention is paid to different epistemological criteria for this theory taking into account both empirical analysis of the real stability of economic systems and the problem of unobservability of equilibrium states.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Dewhurst ◽  
Christopher Burr

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Metzinger

To speak of “inferences,” “interpretations,” and so forth is just folk psychology. It creates new homunculi, and it is also implausible from a purely phenomenological perspective. Phenomenal volition must be described in the conceptual framework of an empirically plausible theory of mental representation. It is a non sequitur to conclude from dissociability that the functional properties determining phenomenal volition never make a causal contribution.


1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Robinson
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-39
Author(s):  
Steven Daniel
Keyword(s):  

Mindscapes ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 52-60
Author(s):  
John Haugeland
Keyword(s):  

Neurocase ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Baron-cohen ◽  
Sally Wheelwright ◽  
Valerie Stone ◽  
Melissa Rutherford

1989 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Reynolds

These three books cover the gamut of argument about deterrence, ranging from its politics to its theoretical status and its morality. The authors, while diverse in their professional status, being government 'experts', lawyers, theologians, political scientists and philosophers, all have this in common: they seek to tell us what to do. They attempt to relate theory to practice either to justify instrumental means or goals or to prescribe them. In this sense they are all contributors to the field of strategic reasoning.


1970 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Cravens ◽  
K. Edward Renner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document