The Development of Human Races under the Law of Natural Selection

Author(s):  
Alfred Russel Wallace
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Karen Kh. Momdzhyan

1978 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth V. Nelson

The old argument from design in Nature, as given by Paley, which formerly seemed to me so conclusive, fails, now that the law of Natural Selection has been discovered. Charles Darwin


2018 ◽  
pp. 236-254
Author(s):  
Timothy C. Campbell

This chapter aims to measure the biopolitical stakes of Darwin’s thinking of variability and natural selection in a historical ontology of ourselves today. When most contemporary ontologies point to catastrophe and mass extinction, what kinds of aesthetic and political strategies does a biopolitical reading of Darwin make available? One possibility, the chapter argues, is through a reconsideration of comedy and its associated pratfalls, the result of the law of gravity having been exiled from Darwin’s Origin of Species.


Synthese ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. van Hateren

AbstractThe causal efficacy of a material system is usually thought to be produced by the law-like actions and interactions of its constituents. Here, a specific system is constructed and explained that produces a cause that cannot be understood in this way, but instead has novel and autonomous efficacy. The construction establishes a proof-of-feasibility of strong emergence. The system works by utilizing randomness in a targeted and cyclical way, and by relying on sustained evolution by natural selection. It is not vulnerable to standard arguments against strong emergence, in particular ones that assume that the physical realm is causally closed. Moreover, it does not suffer from epiphenomenalism or causal overdetermination. The system uses only standard material components and processes, and is fully consistent with naturalism. It is discussed whether the emergent cause can still be viewed as ‘material’ in the way that term is commonly understood.


Homo sapiens now has the power to veto the evolution of his own species. In the mathematics of ‘overkill’ it is estimated (Pauling 1963) that the nuclear stockpile amounts to more than 320 000 megatons, i.e. a ration of more than 100 tons of TNT-equivalent for every man, woman and child on earth or 14 tons per acre of the entire land-surface. Since Homo sapiens is exceptional among the creatures in so far as he deliberately destroys his own species in internecine war, and since he has now the capacity for annihilation it becomes necessary to ritualize his acquired habits of self-destruction. That means contriving intra-species relationships as sensibly as do the animals and observing the Law of the Jungle, by which no predator ever exterminates the species on which it preys nor vents its aggressive instincts to the hazard of its own kind. ‘War is Nature’s pruning hook’, said Sir Arthur Keith (1927). That was a strange interpretation of ‘the survival of the fittest’, but it was the kind of statement which could be invoked as scientific ‘authority’ for accepting mutual destruction as an innate characteristic and for regarding war as part of the mechanism of natural selection rather than as a temporary deviation.


1895 ◽  
Vol 58 (347-352) ◽  
pp. 240-242 ◽  

Consider a population in which sexual selection and natural selection may or may not be taking place. Assume only that the deviations from the mean in the case of any organ of any generation follow exactly or closely the normal law of frequency, then the following expressions may be shown to give the law of inheritance of the population.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document