Social choice and public decision making

1988 ◽  
Vol 98 (389) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Christopher Bliss ◽  
Walter P. Heller ◽  
Ross M. Starr ◽  
David A. Starrett ◽  
Ross. M. Starr

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2 (118)) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
IRINA P. SIDORCHUK ◽  
◽  
ANTON A. PARFENCHIK ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaclyn Carroll ◽  
Pete Bsumek

The field of Environmental Communication has often critiqued the shortcomings of public hearings, noting their limitations in bringing about effective and equitable public decision making. While this work has been significant, it has tended to limit the deliberative field to public hearings themselves, sometimes going so far as to assume that public hearings are the only spaces in which significant deliberations occur. Using a field analysis of the “No Coal Plant” campaign in Surry County, Virginia (2008–2013), the authors illuminate some limitations of existing literature. Their analysis suggests that while public hearings can be extremely limiting, even “failed” public hearings can play a critical role in constituting, organizing, and pacing formal and informal deliberative spaces, which are necessary for communities as they manage the stresses and strains of the decision-making process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document