Person complementarity and (pseudo) Person Case Constraint effects: Evidence from Inuktitut
2019 ◽
Vol 64
(4)
◽
pp. 592-616
AbstractThis paper examines the nature of person complementarity in Eastern Canadian Inuktitut (Eskimo-Aleut), arguing that despite its apparent patterning as a Person Case Constraint (PCC) effect, it is not due to the presence of a defective intervener blocking person agreement with a lower argument, as is often the case in other languages. Instead, the observed effect is caused by a defective or missing person probe on C that cannot value local person features on absolutive arguments. Given the use of the PCC as a diagnostic for differentiating clitics and agreement, this result has implications for the proper identification of φ-marking in Inuktitut.
Keyword(s):
2012 ◽
Vol 59
(1-2)
◽
pp. 49-84
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
1999 ◽
Vol 15
(3)
◽
pp. 275-284
◽