scholarly journals CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR (SEMI-) AUTOMATED DERIVATION OF EVALUATION CRITERIA IN REQUIREMENTS MODELLING

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 937-946
Author(s):  
D. Horber ◽  
B. Schleich ◽  
S. Wartzack
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Product Development ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Solution Space ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Requirements Modelling

AbstractRequirements act as a limitation of the solution space, which represents the stakeholders’ needs and guides the whole product development process. Therefore, forgotten requirements can lead to wrong decisions when using them as a basis for decision-making. This contribution introduces a novel approach to link the requirement and evaluation criteria models to address this problem. For setting up those criteria consistently, the requirements are classified using natural language processing and derived by a ruleset based on a developed mapping between requirement classes and criteria types.

A TOOL FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE MONITORING (PDPM) FOR ALIGNMENT WITH COMPETITIVE PRIORITIES

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (06) ◽  
pp. 1333-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
GÜL E. OKUDAN KREMER ◽  
GÜLŞEN AKMAN
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
Performance Monitoring ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Solution Method ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Competitive Priorities ◽  
Decision Making Problem

Product Development Process (PDP) has been recognized as a source of competitive profits, and thus, it has received increasing attention. The existing methods for monitoring PDP performance, however, are either cumbersome or fail to connect the competitive priorities to the performance management process. Accordingly, in this paper, a model to evaluate PDP performance is considered as a multi-criteria decision-making problem; and a solution method, based on DEMATEL and ANP, is proposed. The evaluation criteria set was developed using the concept of competitive priorities, and the overall model was applied to an actual data set from a group of machine manufacturers in Turkey. The use scenarios for the model are also discussed.

Evaluation and Prioritization of Cross-Linked Requirements in the Automotive Development Process

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delia Ilie ◽  
Udo Lindemann ◽  
Andreas Kain
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Computational Procedure ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Information Criteria ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Phase Complex ◽  
The Right

During the initial stages of a project, a crucial course is set that can determine the success or failure of the project. During this phase requirements are determined, analyzed and allocated to the corresponding product development phase. Complex products with a high degree of customization require the management of a large amount of information. The prioritization of this information in regard to their time sequence in the product development process has to be analyzed. Interviews conducted in the automotive industry show that the requirement management processes in the early design phases are insufficient and lack solid categorization and prioritization methodologies. This study presents a methodical procedure to improve the allocation of the right information to the right time in the development process. In this methodology, the prioritization of requirements as a function of the degree of cross-linking was achieved through three steps: 1. the evaluation criteria definition, 2. the establishment of a computational procedure, 3. the evaluation of requirements and the calculation of their priority. In the first step, an information prioritization signature was created consisting of a set of relevant information criteria and class structures to allow for the evaluation of the varied spectrum of requirements. In the second step, not only the degree of cross-linking is considered but additionally the types of links between requirements are worked out to allow for prioritization. Finally in the third step, a case study is presented to validate the methodology and provide the reader with an example of how requirements are evaluated and prioritized.

scholarly journals From Idea to Production: A Retrospective and Longitudinal Case Study of Prototypes and Prototyping Strategies

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Arndt Hansen ◽  
Ali Gürcan Özkil
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Solution Space ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Integrated Systems ◽  
Longitudinal Case Study ◽  
Isolated Systems

Abstract This study explores the value of visualizing the prototyping activities in a new product development process from idea to production. Through a case study of a hardware startup, we present a visualization of their prototyping processes, from early idea to the introduction of several product versions to market. Analyzing qualitative and quantitative parameters of the visualization allows us to understand how prototyping strategies can change over the course of a product development process. Specifically, we focus on the prototyping of parallel concepts, iterations of concepts, manufacturing processes used for prototypes as well as prototyping of isolated or integrated systems. Based on this longitudinal analysis, we present a number of insights that are otherwise difficult to extract. We observe how parallel prototypes of isolated systems can be used to explore the solution space and later be synthesized into prototypes for integrated systems. Furthermore, we understand how the need to scale up production can lead to increased prototyping activities, as several parts of a product must be redesigned. This study illustrates the utility of a retrospective visualization approach and serves as the first step in formulation of generalized guidelines for prototyping strategies for holistic product development, through further case studies.

scholarly journals Reliability Implementation and Cost Trade-off of Product during the Development Process

2018 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. 02003
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Qi Zhang ◽  
Weijia Feng ◽  
Huichao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Product Development ◽  
Optimization Model ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Optimal Parameters ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Work Input ◽  
Environmental Adaptability

Modern product needs to meet the reliability requirements during the development process. The reliability in this paper refers to an integral view of a product’s reliability, maintainability, supportability, testability, safety and environmental adaptability. However, during the product development process, the two problems are how to evaluate the implementation and how to determine the work input costs of reliability. This paper proposes a method to evaluate the degree of reliability implementation. And it researches the schemes and targets decision-making method based on trade-off analysis. Through establishing and solving trade-off optimization model, the results can help decision makers find the optimal parameters program and cost goals.

Concurrent Design and Manufacturing for Mechanical Systems

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuang-Hua Chang ◽  
Javier Silva ◽  
Ira Bryant
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Product Development ◽  
Product Design ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Product Performance ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Concurrent Design ◽  
Manufacturing Cost ◽  
Design Decision ◽  
Design And Manufacturing

Abstract Conventional product development process employs a design-build-break philosophy. The sequentially executed product development process often results in a prolonged lead-time and an elevated product cost. The proposed concurrent design and manufacturing (CDM) process employs physics-based computational methods together with computer graphics technique for product design. This proposed approach employs Virtual Prototyping (VP) technology to support a cross-functional team analyzing product performance, reliability, and manufacturing cost early in the product development stage; and conducting quantitative trade-off for design decision making. Physical prototypes of the product design are then produced using Rapid Prototyping (RP) technique primarily for design verification purposes. The proposed CDM approach holds potential for shortening the overall product development cycle, improving product quality, and reducing product cost. A software tool environment that supports CDM for mechanical systems is being built at the Concurrent Design and Manufacturing Research Laboratory (http://cdm.ou.edu) at the University of Oklahoma. A snap shot of the environment is illustrated using a two-stroke engine example. This paper presents three unique concepts and methods for product development: (i) bringing product performance, quality, and manufacturing cost together in early design stage for design considerations, (ii) supporting design decision-making through a quantitative approach, and (iii) incorporating rapid prototyping for design verification through physical prototypes.

scholarly journals Evaluation and Segmentation of Printing Accessories Suppliers Based on the Integration of the Best Worst Method and Fuzzy TOPSIS (Case Study at PT. Udaka Indonesia)

OPSI ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Wakhid Nur Hidayat ◽  
Elly Wuryaningtyas Yunitasari ◽  
Patrisius Edi Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Supplier Evaluation ◽  
Industrial Environment ◽  
Best Worst Method

In an increasingly competitive industrial environment, every company strives to increase the quality and efficiency of its product development process. PT. Udaka Indonesia, a clothing manufacturer, is experiencing raw material shortages that disrupt the company's production process. The goal of this research is to assess and segment the company's suppliers. The Best Worst Method (BWM) is employed for weighting criteria, and Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to rank alternative providers and subsequently segment them. The dimensions of capabilities (8 criteria with 26 sub-criteria) and willingness (4 criteria with 15 sub-criteria) make up the company's supplier evaluation criteria. The evaluation results suggest that suppliers A2, B2, C2, and D2 are the best in terms of capabilities for label accessories, stickers, paper tags, and polybags, respectively, while A1, B2, C2, and D2 are the best in terms of willingness. Supplier segmentation results show that segmentation 1 includes suppliers C1, B1, B3, and D1, segmentation 2 includes supplier A3, and segmentation 4 includes suppliers A1, A2, B2, B4, C2, and D2. 

Professional Issues: Leadership in the Product Development Process: Attitude Counts!

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh E. McLoone
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Product Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Design Teams ◽  
Professional Issues ◽  
User Experiences

Editor's Note: Our attitudes make a difference as we participate in the product development process and meet challenges that arise for us individually or for the team. The author offers 10 lessons learned about attitudes and how they have helped or hindered efforts to create superior user experiences and industry-leading products. Previous articles by Hugh McLoone in this Ergonomics in Design column have covered other aspects of leadership, including schedule constraints, decision making, communication, and teamwork. Questioning the design of an existing product – or even the research on which it is based – can help design teams find new ways to succeed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document