DETERMINING CROSSING NUMBERS OF GRAPHS OF ORDER SIX USING CYCLIC PERMUTATIONS

2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAL STAŠ

We extend known results concerning crossing numbers by giving the crossing number of the join product$G+D_{n}$, where the connected graph$G$consists of one$4$-cycle and of two leaves incident with the same vertex of the$4$-cycle, and$D_{n}$consists of$n$isolated vertices. The proofs are done with the help of software that generates all cyclic permutations for a given number$k$and creates a graph for calculating the distances between all$(k-1)!$vertices of the graph.

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (09) ◽  
pp. 1043-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
JESÚS LEAÑOS ◽  
GELASIO SALAZAR

We describe a relationship between the crossing number of a graph G with a 2-edge-cut C and the crossing numbers of the components of G-C. Let G be a connected graph with a 2-edge-cut C := [V1,V2]. Let u1u2, v1v2 be the edges of C, so that ui,vi ∈ Vi for i = 1,2, and let Gi := G[Vi] and G'i := Gi + uivi. We show that if either G1 or G2 is not connected, then cr (G) = cr (G1) + cr (G2), and that if they are both connected then cr (G) = cr (G'1) + cr (G'2). We use this to show how to decompose crossing-critical graphs with 2-edge-cuts into smaller, 3-edge-connected crossing-critical graphs. We also observe that this settles a question arising from knot theory, raised by Sawollek, by describing exactly under which conditions the crossing number of the connected sum of two graphs equals the sum of the crossing numbers of the individual graphs.


Filomat ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 2829-2846
Author(s):  
Michal Stas

The main aim of the paper is to give the crossing number of the join product G* + Dn for the connected graph G* of order six consisting of P4 + D1 and of one leaf incident with some inner vertex of the path P4 on four vertices, and where Dn consists of n isolated vertices. In the proofs, it will be extend the idea of the minimum numbers of crossings between two different subgraphs from the set of subgraphs which do not cross the edges of the graph G* onto the set of subgraphs by which the edges of G* are crossed exactly once. Due to the mentioned algebraic topological approach, we are able to extend known results concerning crossing numbers for join products of new graphs. The proofs are done with the help of software that generates all cyclic permutations for a given number k, and creates a new graph COG for calculating the distances between all (k-1)! vertices of the graph. Finally, by adding one edge to the graph G*, we are able to obtain the crossing number of the join product of one other graph with the discrete graph Dn.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1277
Author(s):  
Michal Staš

The main aim of the paper is to establish the crossing numbers of the join products of the paths and the cycles on n vertices with a connected graph on five vertices isomorphic to the graph K1,1,3\e obtained by removing one edge e incident with some vertex of order two from the complete tripartite graph K1,1,3. The proofs are done with the help of well-known exact values for the crossing numbers of the join products of subgraphs of the considered graph with paths and cycles. Finally, by adding some edges to the graph under consideration, we obtain the crossing numbers of the join products of other graphs with the paths and the cycles on n vertices.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-146
Author(s):  
STEFAN BEREZNY ◽  
MICHAL STAS ◽  
◽  

The main purpose of this article is broaden known results concerning crossing numbers for join of graphs of order six. We give the crossing number of the join product G + Dn, where the graph G consists of one 5-cycle and of one isolated vertex, and Dn consists on n isolated vertices. The proof is done with the help of software that generates all cyclic permutations for a given number k, and creates a new graph COG for calculating the distances between all vertices of the graph. Finally, by adding some edges to the graph G, we are able to obtain the crossing numbers of the join product with the discrete graph Dn and with the path Pn on n vertices for other two graphs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
MARIAN KLESC ◽  
◽  
JANA PETRILLOVA ◽  
MATUS VALO ◽  
◽  
...  

The crossing number cr(G) of a graph G is the minimal number of crossings over all drawings of G in the plane. The exact crossing number is known only for few specific families of graphs. Cartesian products of two graphs belong to the first families of graphs for which the crossing number has been studied. Some results concerning crossing numbers are also known for join products of two graphs. In the paper, we start to collect the crossing numbers for the strong product of graphs, namely for the strong product of two paths.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050019
Author(s):  
Yuanan Diao

For an unoriented link [Formula: see text], let [Formula: see text] be the ropelength of [Formula: see text]. It is known that in general [Formula: see text] is at least of the order [Formula: see text], and at most of the order [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is the minimum crossing number of [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, it is known that there exist families of (infinitely many) links with the property [Formula: see text]. A long standing open conjecture states that if [Formula: see text] is alternating, then [Formula: see text] is at least of the order [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we show that the braid index of a link also gives a lower bound of its ropelength. More specifically, we show that there exists a constant [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for any [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the largest braid index among all braid indices corresponding to all possible orientation assignments of the components of [Formula: see text] (called the maximum braid index of [Formula: see text]). Consequently, [Formula: see text] for any link [Formula: see text] whose maximum braid index is proportional to its crossing number. In the case of alternating links, the maximum braid indices for many of them are proportional to their crossing numbers hence the above conjecture holds for these alternating links.


1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
LÁSZLÓ A. SZÉKELY

We show that an old but not well-known lower bound for the crossing number of a graph yields short proofs for a number of bounds in discrete plane geometry which were considered hard before: the number of incidences among points and lines, the maximum number of unit distances among n points, the minimum number of distinct distances among n points.


2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (07) ◽  
pp. 857-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUANAN DIAO

It has long been conjectured that the crossing numbers of links are additive under the connected sum of links. This is a difficult problem in knot theory and has been open for more than 100 years. In fact, many questions of much weaker conditions are still open. For instance, it is not known whether Cr(K1#K2)≥Cr(K1) or Cr(K1#K2)≥Cr(K2) holds in general, here K1#K2 is the connected sum of K1 and K2 and Cr(K) stands for the crossing number of the link K. However, for alternating links K1 and K2, Cr(K1#K2)=Cr(K1)+Cr(K2) does hold. On the other hand, if K1 is an alternating link and K2 is any link, then we have Cr(K1#K2)≥Cr(K1). In this paper, we show that there exists a wide class of links over which the crossing number is additive under the connected sum operation. This class is different from the class of all alternating links. It includes all torus knots and many alternating links. Furthermore, if K1 is a connected sum of any given number of links from this class and K2 is a non-trivial knot, we prove that Cr(K1#K2)≥Cr(K1)+3.


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-75
Author(s):  
MARIAN KLESC ◽  
◽  
JANA PETRILLOVA ◽  

Kulli at al. started to characterize line graphs with crossing number one. In this paper, the similar problems were solved for the Cartesian products of two graphs. The necessary and sufficient conditions are given for all pairs of graphs G1 and G2 for which the crossing number of their Cartesian product G1 × G2 is one or two.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. 1950085
Author(s):  
Yuanan Diao ◽  
Claus Ernst ◽  
Attila Por ◽  
Uta Ziegler

For a knot or link [Formula: see text], let [Formula: see text] be the ropelength of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] be the crossing number of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we show that there exists a constant [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for any [Formula: see text], i.e. the upper bound of the ropelength of any knot is almost linear in terms of its minimum crossing number. This result is a significant improvement over the best known upper bound established previously, which is of the form [Formula: see text]. The proof is based on a divide-and-conquer approach on 4-regular plane graphs: a 4-regular plane graph of [Formula: see text] is first repeatedly subdivided into many small subgraphs and then reconstructed from these small subgraphs on the cubic lattice with its topology preserved with a total length of the order [Formula: see text]. The result then follows since a knot can be recovered from a graph that is topologically equivalent to a regular projection of it (which is a 4-regular plane graph).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document