Cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf persons with additional disability

2006 ◽  
Vol 121 (7) ◽  
pp. 635-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Daneshi ◽  
S Hassanzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Mental Retardation ◽  
Learning Disability ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Auditory Perception ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
One Year ◽  
Deaf Persons ◽  
Prelingually Deaf

Objectives: We aimed to identify the frequency with which the following conditions were present as a second disability in cochlear-implanted, prelingually deaf persons: mild and moderate mental retardation; learning disability; attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder; cerebral palsy; congenital blindness; and autism. We also aimed to document the development of auditory perception in patients having one of these additional disabilities.Study design: A retrospective study was designed to pursue the above aims.Methods: We examined the records of 398 cochlear-implanted, prelingually deaf patients who had received a cochlear implant at least one year previously. Patients were selected who showed a delay in motor, cognitive or emotional development. The selected cases were referred for psychological evaluation in order to identify patients with additional disabilities. We then compared these patients' auditory perception prior to and one year following cochlear implantation.Results: A total of 60 (15 per cent) cochlear-implanted, prelingually deaf patients were diagnosed with additional disabilities. These were classified as: mild mental retardation in eight cases (13.33 per cent); moderate mental retardation in five (8.33 per cent); learning disability in 20 (33.33 per cent); attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in 15 (25 per cent); cerebral palsy in five (8.33); congenital blindness in three (5 per cent); and autism in four (6.66 per cent). All patients showed significant development in speech perception, except for autistic and congenitally deaf-blind patients.Conclusion: Although cochlear implantation is not contraindicated in prelingually deaf persons with additional disabilities, congenitally deaf-blind and autistic patients showed limited development in auditory perception as a main outcome of cochlear implantation. These patients require unique rehabilitation in order to achieve more auditory development.

Long-term risk of epilepsy, cerebral palsy and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children affected by a threatened abortion in utero

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Dudukina ◽  
Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
Vera Ehrenstein
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
In Utero ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Sibling Pairs ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Threatened Abortion

Abstract Background The birth of a child affected by a threatened abortion (TAB) in utero is associated with autism spectrum disorder; association with other neurological disorders is unknown. Methods This nationwide registry-based cohort study included singletons live-born in Denmark (1979–2010), followed through 2016. The outcomes were epilepsy, cerebral palsy (CP) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for birth year, birth order, parental age, morbidity, medication use and maternal socio-economic factors. To remove time-invariant family-shared confounding, we applied sibling analyses. Results The study population included 1 864 221 singletons live-born in 1979–2010. Among the TAB-affected children (N = 59 134) vs TAB-unaffected children, at the end of follow-up, the cumulative incidence was 2.2% vs 1.6% for epilepsy, 0.4% vs 0.2% for CP and 5.5% vs 4.2% for ADHD (for children born in 1995–2010). The adjusted HRs were 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16–1.34] for epilepsy, 1.42 (95% CI 1.20–1.68) for CP and 1.21 (95% CI 1.14–1.29) for ADHD. In the sibling design, the adjusted HRs were unity for epilepsy (full siblings: 0.96, 95% CI 0.82–1.12; maternal: 1.04, 95% CI 0.90–1.20; paternal: 1.08, 95% CI 0.93–1.25) and ADHD (full: 1.08, 95% CI 0.92–1.27; maternal: 1.04, 95% CI 0.90–1.20; paternal: 1.08, 95% CI 0.93–1.25). For CP, HRs shifted away from unity among sibling pairs (full: 2.92, 95% CI 1.33–6.39; maternal: 2.03, 95% CI 1.15–3.57; paternal: 3.28, 95% CI 1.36–7.91). Conclusions The birth of a child affected by TAB in utero was associated with a greater risk of CP, but not epilepsy or ADHD.

Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy and deep relaxation for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

2019 ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Nawel Abdesslem ◽  
Sabeur Hamrouni ◽  
Roy Jesse Shephard ◽  
Mohamed Souhaiel Chelly
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Attention Deficit ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
One Year

Objective: This study made a preliminary exploration of the efficacy of physically-based cognitive-behavioral therapy and deep relaxation for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: ADHD behavior and cognitive functions were assessed by test D2 and Conner’s scale before and after a one-year physically-based training program. The reliability of test scores was assessed by repeat testing of a control group (CG) of 10 students who did not have ADHD. Children (10 per group) with ADHD were assigned to physically-based cognitive-behavioral therapy and deep relaxation (E1) or physically-based cognitive-behavioral alone (E2). Results: After 52 weeks of treatment, an intra-group comparison showed that E1 and E2 had improved their scores on the test D2, whereas CG showed no significant change. In addition, most participants with ADHD showed a remarkable improvement in their attentional behavior, with group E1 responding better to treatment than group E2. Conclusions: Physically-based cognitive behavioral therapy appears to improve function and social competence in children with ADHD, and should be recommended as an alternative or supplement to pharmaceutical treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document