Quality of Life after Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery with Nasoseptal Flap – A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Chuan Hao Gui ◽  
Alex C. Tham
2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (6) ◽  
pp. 1318-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Young Seo ◽  
Do‐Hyun Nam ◽  
Doo‐Sik Kong ◽  
Jung Joo Lee ◽  
Gwanghui Ryu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (06) ◽  
pp. 659-663
Author(s):  
Christian P. Soneru ◽  
Charles A. Riley ◽  
Shlomo Minkowitz ◽  
Abtin Tabaee ◽  
Vijay K. Anand ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective This study was aimed to compare the safety profiles, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) scores of Adherus dural sealant, a novel tissue glue designed for skull base surgery. Design Present study is a prospective case series. Setting The research work took place at a tertiary-care academic medical center. Participants Consecutive series of 26 patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) with Adherus was compared with a control group of 24 patients matched for tumor type and size with DuraSeal as a sealant. Main Outcome Measures Postoperative complication rates, imaging characteristics, and postoperative SNOT-22 scores were measured and compared. Results No postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, intracranial hemorrhages, or mucoceles were observed in either cohort. Adherus was more likely to be identifiable on immediate postoperative MRI (50 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.032). In patients in whom a nasoseptal flap was utilized, the flap was opposed to the skull base in all cases regardless of sealant selected. Postoperative SNOT-22 total (17.25 [±10.81] vs. 14.85 [±14.22], p = 0.609) and subdomain scores were similar between the two groups. Conclusions Adherus dural sealant appears to be a safe alternative to Duraseal in ESBS with comparable quality of life outcomes and imaging findings. These preliminary results are promising but should be examined in a larger population with long-term follow-up.


2013 ◽  
Vol 75 (02) ◽  
pp. 073-089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouk Borg ◽  
Alaa Al-Mousa ◽  
Nikolaos Haliasos ◽  
David Choi ◽  
Matthew Kirkman

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (S 04) ◽  
pp. S291-S299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Lavigne ◽  
Daniel Faden ◽  
Eric Wang ◽  
Carl Snyderman

Objective The nasoseptal flap (NSF) is considered the primary vascularized flap for reconstruction of dural defects with endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base. However, the complications and morbidities associated with this reconstructive flap are poorly understood. This article presents a systematic review of the complications and morbidities related to the use of the NSF in skull base surgery. Method A systematic review of the literature based on published guidelines was performed to identify potential complications and morbidities related to the NSF. The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 1950 to February 5, 2018. Results Twenty-seven articles were identified. Reported complications were as follows: NSF necrosis (4 studies; [0–1.3%]), mucocele formation (5 studies; [0–3.6%]), septal perforation (6 studies, [0–14.4%]), nasal dorsum collapse (2 studies, [0.7–5.8%]), effects on quality of life (QoL) (8 studies), and olfactory loss (11 studies). Conclusion Although complications associated with the NSF may be underreported in the literature, the NSF appears to be a safe and reliable reconstructive flap in EES of the skull base.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document