Intranasal Cross-Sectional Area Changes Following Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery and Their Relation to Postoperative Quality of Life

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Bedrosian ◽  
Edward McCoul ◽  
Vijay Anand ◽  
Theodore Schwartz
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 1124-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward D. McCoul ◽  
Amit S. Patel ◽  
Jeffrey C. Bedrosian ◽  
Vijay K. Anand ◽  
Theodore H. Schwartz

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (6) ◽  
pp. 1318-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Young Seo ◽  
Do‐Hyun Nam ◽  
Doo‐Sik Kong ◽  
Jung Joo Lee ◽  
Gwanghui Ryu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (06) ◽  
pp. 659-663
Author(s):  
Christian P. Soneru ◽  
Charles A. Riley ◽  
Shlomo Minkowitz ◽  
Abtin Tabaee ◽  
Vijay K. Anand ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective This study was aimed to compare the safety profiles, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) scores of Adherus dural sealant, a novel tissue glue designed for skull base surgery. Design Present study is a prospective case series. Setting The research work took place at a tertiary-care academic medical center. Participants Consecutive series of 26 patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) with Adherus was compared with a control group of 24 patients matched for tumor type and size with DuraSeal as a sealant. Main Outcome Measures Postoperative complication rates, imaging characteristics, and postoperative SNOT-22 scores were measured and compared. Results No postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, intracranial hemorrhages, or mucoceles were observed in either cohort. Adherus was more likely to be identifiable on immediate postoperative MRI (50 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.032). In patients in whom a nasoseptal flap was utilized, the flap was opposed to the skull base in all cases regardless of sealant selected. Postoperative SNOT-22 total (17.25 [±10.81] vs. 14.85 [±14.22], p = 0.609) and subdomain scores were similar between the two groups. Conclusions Adherus dural sealant appears to be a safe alternative to Duraseal in ESBS with comparable quality of life outcomes and imaging findings. These preliminary results are promising but should be examined in a larger population with long-term follow-up.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waruna Peiris ◽  
Flavia M Cicuttini ◽  
Maria Constantinou ◽  
Abbas Yaqobi ◽  
Sultana Monira Hussain ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To examine the associations between hip muscle cross-sectional area and hip pain and function in community-based individuals with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis. Methods: This study included 27 participants with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis. Cross-sectional area of hip muscles, including psoas major, rectus femoris, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius and minimus, adductor longus and magnus, obturator internus, and obturator externus, were measured from magnetic resonance images. Hip pain and function were evaluated using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Results: After adjusting for age and gender, greater cross-sectional area of adductor longus and magnus was associated with a higher HOOS score in quality of life (regression coefficient 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-2.7, p=0.02), activity of daily living (regression coefficient 1.3, 95% CI 0.1-2.6, p=0.04) and sport and recreation function (regression coefficient 1.6, 95% CI 0.1-3.0, p=0.04). Greater cross-sectional area of psoas major was associated with a higher quality of life score (regression coefficient 3.6, 95% CI -0.5 to 7.7, p=0.08). The cross-sectional area of hip muscles was not significantly associated with HOOS pain or symptom score. Conclusion: Greater cross-sectional area of hip adductors was associated with better function and quality of life in individuals with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis. Greater cross-sectional area of hip flexors might be associated with better quality of life. These findings, while need to be confirmed in longitudinal studies, suggest that targeting the hip adductor and flexor muscles may improve function and quality of life in those with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P16-P16
Author(s):  
Ivan H. El-Sayed ◽  
Ehab Y. N. Hanna ◽  
Carl H. Snyderman ◽  
Michael E. Kupferman ◽  
Marc Rosen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document