Systematic Review of Olfactory Outcomes After Nasoseptal Flap Harvest for Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: Does Using Cold Steel or Olfactory Strip Preservation Matter?

Author(s):  
Suat Kılıç ◽  
Satyan B. Sreenath ◽  
Kevin Grafmiller ◽  
Troy D. Woodard ◽  
Pablo F. Recinos ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Erin Mamuyac Lopez ◽  
Zainab Farzal ◽  
Kelly Marie Dean ◽  
Craig Miller ◽  
Justin Cates Morse ◽  
...  

Objectives: The frequency of endoscopic skull base surgery in pediatric patients is increasing. This study’s aim is to systematically review the literature for endoscopic skull base surgery outcomes in children/adolescents ages 0-18 years. Design: A systematic review of the literature was performed in PubMed and SCOPUS databases querying studies from 2000-2020 using PRISMA guidelines. Final inclusion criteria included: case series with 10+ patients with pediatric patients age ≤18 years, endoscopic or endoscopic-assisted skull base surgery, and outcomes reported. Setting: Tertiary care medical center Participants: Children/adolescents ages 0-18 years who underwent endoscopic skull base surgery Main Outcome Measures: Patient demographics, pathology, reconstructive technique, intra-operative findings, intra-operative and post-operative surgical complications. Results: Systematic literature search yielded 287 publications. Of these, 12 studies discussing a total of 399 patients age 0-18 years met inclusion criteria for final analysis. 7 of 12 studies discussed a single pathology. The most common pathology was a skull base defect causing CSF leak. The majority of skull base repairs were made with free tissue grafts. The most common post-operative complication was CSF leak (n=40). Twelve cases of meningitis occurred post-operatively with two of these episodes resulting in death. Conclusions: Endoscopic skull base surgery has been performed recently in the pediatric population in a variety of disease states. Inconsistent individual-level data and reporting standards are present in existing studies posing challenges for comparative analysis. Standardized reporting will aid future reviews and meta-analysis for rare skull base pathology.


2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. E7 ◽  
Author(s):  
James K. Liu ◽  
Richard F. Schmidt ◽  
Osamah J. Choudhry ◽  
Pratik A. Shukla ◽  
Jean Anderson Eloy

Extended endoscopic endonasal approaches have allowed for a minimally invasive solution for removal of a variety of ventral skull base lesions, including intradural tumors. Depending on the location of the pathological entity, various types of surgical corridors are used, such as transcribriform, transplanum transtuberculum, transsellar, transclival, and transodontoid approaches. Often, a large skull base dural defect with a high-flow CSF leak is created after endoscopic skull base surgery. Successful reconstruction of the cranial base defect is paramount to separate the intracranial contents from the paranasal sinus contents and to prevent postoperative CSF leakage. The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) has become the workhorse for cranial base reconstruction after endoscopic skull base surgery, dramatically reducing the rate of postoperative CSF leakage since its implementation. In this report, the authors review the surgical technique and describe the operative nuances and lessons learned for successful multilayered PNSF reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow CSF leaks created after endoscopic skull base surgery. The authors specifically highlight important surgical pearls that are critical for successful PNSF reconstruction, including target-specific flap design and harvesting, pedicle preservation, preparation of bony defect and graft site to optimize flap adherence, multilayered closure technique, maximization of the reach of the flap, final flap positioning, and proper bolstering and buttressing of the PNSF to prevent flap dehiscence. Using this technique in 93 patients, the authors' overall postoperative CSF leak rate was 3.2%. An illustrative intraoperative video demonstrating the reconstruction technique is also presented.


2014 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward D. McCoul ◽  
Vijay K. Anand ◽  
Ameet Singh ◽  
Gurston G. Nyquist ◽  
Madeleine R. Schaberg ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Mayor de Carvalho ◽  
Ricardo Landini Lutaif Dolci ◽  
Jeniffer Cristina Kozechen Rickli ◽  
Daniela Akemi Tateno ◽  
Davi Sousa Garcia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 150-155
Author(s):  
Jordan C. Xu ◽  
George Hanna ◽  
Brendan M. Fong ◽  
Frank P.K. Hsu ◽  
Gilbert Cadena ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. e7-e12
Author(s):  
Muaid I. Aziz Baban ◽  
Paolo Battaglia ◽  
Mokarbesh Hadi Mohammed ◽  
Davide Locatelli ◽  
Abdulrahman Shawkat ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document