scholarly journals Relatively minimal quasihomogeneous projective 3-folds

2000 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 149-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Kebekus

In the present work we classify the relatively minimal 3-dimensional quasihomogeneous complex projective varieties under the assumption that the automorphism group is not solvable. By relatively minimal we understand varietiesXhaving at most ℚ-factorial terminal singularities and allowing an extremal contractionX→Ywhere dimY< 3.

2000 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 129-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Kebekus

In the present work we describe 3-dimensional complexSL2-varieties where the genericSL2-orbit is a surface. We apply this result to classify the minimal 3-dimensional projective varieties with Picard-number 1 where a semisimple group acts such that the generic orbits are 2-dimensional.This is an ingredient of the classification [Keb99] of the 3-dimensional relatively minimal quasihomogeneous varieties where the automorphism group is not solvable.


2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bolton ◽  
C. Scharlach ◽  
L. Vrancken

In a previous paper it was shown how to associate with a Lagrangian submanifold satisfying Chen's equality in 3-dimensional complex projective space, a minimal surface in the 5-sphere with ellipse of curvature a circle. In this paper we focus on the reverse construction.


2013 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Charles ◽  
Eyal Markman

AbstractWe prove the standard conjectures for complex projective varieties that are deformations of the Hilbert scheme of points on a K3 surface. The proof involves Verbitsky’s theory of hyperholomorphic sheaves and a study of the cohomology algebra of Hilbert schemes of K3 surfaces.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2020 (7) ◽  
pp. 1942-1956
Author(s):  
Davide Lombardo ◽  
Andrea Maffei

Abstract We determine which complex abelian varieties can be realized as the automorphism group of a smooth projective variety.


Author(s):  
Francesco Bei ◽  
Paolo Piazza

Abstract Let $(X,h)$ be a compact and irreducible Hermitian complex space. This paper is devoted to various questions concerning the analytic K-homology of $(X,h)$. In the 1st part, assuming either $\dim (\operatorname{sing}(X))=0$ or $\dim (X)=2$, we show that the rolled-up operator of the minimal $L^2$-$\overline{\partial }$ complex, denoted here $\overline{\eth }_{\textrm{rel}}$, induces a class in $K_0 (X)\equiv KK_0(C(X),\mathbb{C})$. A similar result, assuming $\dim (\operatorname{sing}(X))=0$, is proved also for $\overline{\eth }_{\textrm{abs}}$, the rolled-up operator of the maximal $L^2$-$\overline{\partial }$ complex. We then show that when $\dim (\operatorname{sing}(X))=0$ we have $[\overline{\eth }_{\textrm{rel}}]=\pi _*[\overline{\eth }_M]$ with $\pi :M\rightarrow X$ an arbitrary resolution and with $[\overline{\eth }_M]\in K_0 (M)$ the analytic K-homology class induced by $\overline{\partial }+\overline{\partial }^t$ on $M$. In the 2nd part of the paper we focus on complex projective varieties $(V,h)$ endowed with the Fubini–Study metric. First, assuming $\dim (V)\leq 2$, we compare the Baum–Fulton–MacPherson K-homology class of $V$ with the class defined analytically through the rolled-up operator of any $L^2$-$\overline{\partial }$ complex. We show that there is no $L^2$-$\overline{\partial }$ complex on $(\operatorname{reg}(V),h)$ whose rolled-up operator induces a K-homology class that equals the Baum–Fulton–MacPherson class. Finally in the last part of the paper we prove that under suitable assumptions on $V$ the push-forward of $[\overline{\eth }_{\textrm{rel}}]$ in the K-homology of the classifying space of the fundamental group of $V$ is a birational invariant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document