Comparison of the proteins in salivary glands, saliva and haemolymph of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus female ticks during feeding

Parasitology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wang ◽  
P. A. Nuttall
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Glands ◽  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Guinea Pigs ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Rhipicephalus Appendiculatus ◽  
Host Immunity ◽  
Tick Feeding ◽  
Tick Saliva ◽  
Small Proteins ◽  
Common Antigens

SUMMARYTo compare the proteins in salivary glands, saliva and haemolymph of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus female ticks, antisera were prepared from guinea-pigs immunized with soluble denatured salivary gland extracts (SGE). The extracts were derived from R. appendiculatus female ticks that were either unfed (day 0) or partly fed (day 6). The sera were used in immunoblotting, following SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, to examine the antigen profiles during the course of tick feeding on guinea-pigs. Day 0 and day 6 SGE antisera appeared to detect common proteins in the different tick samples. For example, haemolymph apparently shared some of the small protein bands (31·5–34 kDa) detected in SGEs. These small proteins appeared in both samples at the same stage of feeding, suggesting that haemolymph and salivary glands not only have common antigens but may also share some functions. Furthermore, a number of protein bands were detected in haemolymph before they were apparent in the salivary glands or saliva. Thus some antigens detected in the salivary glands and saliva may be derived from the haemolymph. The results indicate that the host may be exposed to tick saliva antigens that are also present in the haemolymph. We discuss the significance of these observations with regard to the induction of host immunity to ticks and the development of tick vaccines.

scholarly journals Spotted Fever GroupRickettsiaInfection and Transmission Dynamics inAmblyomma maculatum

2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanakan Suwanbongkot ◽  
Ingeborg M. Langohr ◽  
Emma K. Harris ◽  
Wellesley Dittmar ◽  
Rebecca C. Christofferson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Glands ◽  
Spotted Fever ◽  
Attachment Site ◽  
Spotted Fever Group ◽  
Tick Feeding ◽  
Tick Saliva ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Feeding Site ◽  
Vertebrate Hosts ◽  
Tick Salivary Glands

ABSTRACTTick vectors are capable of transmitting several rickettsial species to vertebrate hosts, resulting in various levels of disease. Studies have demonstrated the transmissibility of both rickettsial pathogens and novelRickettsiaspecies or strains with unknown pathogenicity to vertebrate hosts during tick blood meal acquisition; however, the quantitative nature of transmission remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that if infection severity is a function of the rickettsial load delivered during tick transmission, then a more virulent spotted fever group (SFG)Rickettsiaspecies is transmitted at higher levels during tick feeding. UsingAmblyomma maculatumcohorts infected withRickettsia parkerior “CandidatusRickettsia andeanae,” a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was employed to quantify rickettsiae in tick salivary glands and saliva, as well as in the vertebrate hosts at the tick attachment site over the duration of tick feeding. Significantly greater numbers ofR. parkerithan of “Ca. Rickettsia andeanae” rickettsiae were present in tick saliva and salivary glands and in the vertebrate hosts at the feeding site during tick feeding. Microscopy demonstrated the presence of both rickettsial species in tick salivary glands, and immunohistochemical analysis of the attachment site identified localizedR. parkeri, but not “Ca. Rickettsia andeanae,” in the vertebrate host. Lesions were also distinct and more severe in vertebrate hosts exposed toR. parkerithan in those exposed to “Ca. Rickettsia andeanae.” The specific factors that contribute to the generation of a sustained rickettsial infection and subsequent disease have yet to be elucidated, but the results of this study suggest that the rickettsial load in ticks and during transmission may be an important element.

scholarly journals Amelogenins. Purification and partial characterization of proteins from developing bovine dental enamel

1973 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Michael Eggert ◽  
Grania A. Allen ◽  
Ralph C. Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Sodium Dodecyl ◽  
Dental Enamel ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel ◽  
Sedimentation Equilibrium ◽  
Amino Acid Compositions ◽  
Small Proteins ◽  
Equilibrium Ultracentrifugation

1. Procedures are described for the purification of amelogenin electrophoretic components and their analysis for homogeneity by polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis at both acidic and alkaline pH values. 2. Most of these components belonged to two main groups, termed the J group and the C group after their major electrophoretic components. Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis indicated that, within each group, proteins were of similar size, but the C-group proteins were larger than those of the J group. 3. By sedimentation-equilibrium ultracentrifugation and amino acid analysis, the four J-group components were found to be very small proteins (mol. wt. 5500–3000) and, except for one, similar in amino acid composition. The components of the C group were found to be proteins of moderate size (mol. wt. 16800–16100) with very similar amino acid compositions. A third minor amelogenin group of intermediate size was also found, but not further analysed. Details of the results of the ultracentrifuge studies are given in a supplementary paper that has been deposited as Supplementary Publication SUP 50014 at the National Lending Library for Science and Technology, Boston Spa, Yorks. LS23 7BQ, U.K., from whom copies can be obtained on the terms indicated in Biochem. J. (1973) 131, 5. 4. Two of the J-group components were similar to amelogenins isolated by other workers. 5. All amelogenins analysed were rich in proline, glutamic acid, histidine and methionine, and contained no half-cystine. Their amino acid compositions, combined with their molecular weights, serve to distinguish the amelogenins from both collagens and keratins.

Errata

Parasitology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Wang ◽  
P. A. Nuttall
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Glands ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rhipicephalus Appendiculatus ◽  
Tick Saliva ◽  
Igg Binding

Comparison of the proteins in salivary glands, saliva and haemolymph of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus female ticks during feedingParasitology (1994), 109, 517–523Fig. 2. Delete 24 kDa marker between 36 kDa and 29 kDa markers.Fig. 6. Replace 24 to 17·6 kDa with 34, 33·5, 32·5, 31·5, 30, 29 kDa.Fig. 7. Replace 33·2 kDa with 33·5 kDa.Excretion of host immunoglobulin in tick saliva and detection of IgG-binding proteins in tick haemolymph and salivary glandsParasitology (1994), 109, 525–530Fig. 4. Replace 19·2 kDa with 14·2 kDa.

Ultrastructural localization of specific nucleoprotein fractions

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
G. L. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Mouse Liver ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Ultrastructural Localization ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel ◽  
Acid Extraction ◽  
Acid Solutions ◽  
Low Salt ◽  
Liver Nuclei ◽  
Phosphate Groups

Bismuth (Bi) stains nucleoproteins (NPs) by interacting with available amino and primary phosphate groups. These two staining mechanisms are distinguishable by glutaraldehyde crosslinking (Fig. 1,2).Isolated mouse liver nuclei, extracted with salt and acid solutions, fixed in either formaldehyde (form.) or gl utaraldehyde (glut.) and stained with Bi, were viewed to determine the effect of the extractions on Bi stainina. Solubilized NPs were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.Extraction with 0.14 M salt does not change the Bi staining characteristics (Fig. 3). 0.34 M salt reduces nucleolar (Nu) staining but has no effect on interchromatinic (IC) staining (Fig. 4). Proteins responsible for Nu and glut.- insensitive IC staining are removed when nuclei are extracted with 0.6 M salt (Fig. 5, 6). Low salt and acid extraction prevents Bi-Nu staining but has no effect on IC staining (Fig. 7). When nuclei are extracted with 0.6 M salt followed by low salt and acid, all Bi-staining components are removed (Fig. 8).

Isolation of Human Fibrinogen and its Derivatives by Affinity Chromatography on Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro-Lys-Fractogel

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (03) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kuyas ◽  
A Haeberli ◽  
P Walder ◽  
P W Straub
Keyword(s):  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Terminal Sequence ◽  
Purification Method ◽  
Human Fibrinogen ◽  
Isolation Methods ◽  
One Step ◽  
Complementary Binding

SummaryWith an immobilized synthetic pentapeptide GlyProArgProLys comprising the N-terminal sequence GlyProArg of the α-chain of fibrin, a new affinity method for the quantitative isolation of fibrinogen out of anticoagulated plasma was developed. The method proved to be superior to all known isolation methods in respect to ease of use and yield, since fibrinogen could be isolated in one step out of plasma with a recovery of more than 95% when compared to the immunologically measurable amounts of fibrinogen. Moreover the amounts of contaminating proteins such as fibronectin, factor XIII or plasminogen were negligible and the purity of the isolated fibrinogen was higher than 95% as measured by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The clottability was 90% and more. Another advantage of this affinity purification method is the possibility to isolate fibrinogen quantitatively out of small plasma samples (<5 ml). Further, abnormal fibrinogen molecules, provided their complementary binding site for GlyProArg is preserved, may also be quantitatively isolated independent of any solubility differences as compared to normal fibrinogen. In addition fibrin(ogcn) fragments originating from plasmic digestion can be separated on the basis of their affinity to GlyProArg. The described affinity gel can be used more than 50 times without any loss of capacity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document