scholarly journals Implication of Improved Irrigation Pumping Efficiency for Farmer Profit and Energy Use

1979 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Hardin ◽  
Ronald D. Lacewell

Irrigated crop production on the Texas High Plains accounts for more than 80 percent of the value of total crop production in the region. Total economic activity associated with crop production was estimated to be $2.18 billion in 1967 [11]. Because of the importance and contribution of irrigation to the regional economy, any significant adjustments in irrigation create repercussions throughout the region.The price of natural gas within Texas is not subject to interstate regulations. Since 1973, dramatic increases in natural gas price (from $0.50 to more than $2.00/mcf) in the state have caused considerable concern about the economic feasibility of continued irrigation. Research was conducted to estimate the effect of continuing natural gas price increases on irrigation [8].

1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharif M. Masud ◽  
Ronald D. Lacewell

AbstractThe purpose of this paper was to quantify economic and energy use implications of new improved irrigation and limited tillage production systems for the Texas High Plains. Per hectare uses of natural gas and electricity under alternative irrigation distribution systems for corn, sorghum, wheat, cotton, and soybeans were utilized to estimate total amounts of natural gas and electricity used in the production of these crops on the High Plains of Texas. The amount of diesel fuel used was estimated for conventional and limited tillage systems under dryland and irrigation production. Total amounts of water used for the five crops under the improved and conventional irrigation systems were also estimated for the High Plains. Results indicated improved irrigation and limited tillage systems reduced energy and water use on the High Plains. Total natural gas and electricity were estimated to decline over 20 percent, diesel fuel declined 32 percent, and water use for irrigation declined about 23 percent. Use of the improved irrigation and limited tillage production systems was also shown to significantly increase annual net returns to farmers ($40.0 million or 13.3 percent).


1997 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip N. Johnson ◽  
Sukant K. Misra ◽  
R. Terry Ervin

AbstractThe future use of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands is an important agricultural policy issue. To examine the effects of factors that influence landowners' post-contract use of CRP lands, a survey of Texas High Plains CRP contract holders was conducted in 1992. This study analyzes the results of the survey using a qualitative choice model. It was found that the presence of a livestock enterprise in the current contract holder's operation increases the probability of these acres remaining in the established cover. Contract holders who value the commodity base have an increased probability of returning their acres to crop production.


1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip N. Johnson ◽  
Eduardo Segarra

AbstractFour policy alternatives for CRP lands upon expiration of the current contracts in Hale County, Texas are evaluated using chance-constrained programming. It was found that if CRP contracts are extended at the current average rental rate, 40 percent of the current enrollment would be expected to return to crop production, while 66 percent would return to crop production if the program were eliminated. The results also indicate that the marginal value of CRP payments to producers is lower than the marginal value of deficiency payments.


jpa ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Bryant ◽  
S. M. Masud ◽  
R. D. Lacewell ◽  
J. W. Keeling

2016 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 736-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Baumhardt ◽  
S. A. Mauget ◽  
R. C. Schwartz ◽  
O. R. Jones

1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. BARBER ◽  
H. L. CLASSEN ◽  
P. A. THACKER

An overview of energy use in agricultural food systems indicates that, unlike crop production, pork and poultry production will always be an energy sink rather than an energy source. Nevertheless, much more energy is involved in the food system beyond the farm gate than that used in production on the farm. Energy is used in the confinement rearing of swine and poultry for barn heating, ventilation, lights, and feed, water and manure handling. Information on how much energy is used, and on the relative amounts of energy used for each purpose, is far from complete and the differences between production units are large. There are opportunities for energy conservation but these are different for each production stage and for each animal species. Although the list of potential energy conservation opportunities is long, only a few are routinely implemented on even modern, well-managed farms. In many cases, the technical feasibility of energy conservation alternatives is well established, but the economic feasibility cannot be predicted because of missing information on animal-environment interactions. Key words: Energy, animal environments, housing


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (07) ◽  
pp. 274-297
Author(s):  
Robert J. Lascano ◽  
Gary R. Leiker ◽  
Timothy S. Goebel ◽  
Steven A. Mauget ◽  
Dennis C. Gitz III

Crop Science ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 883-884
Author(s):  
J. E. Quisenberry ◽  
L. L. Ray ◽  
D. R. Rummel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document