scholarly journals 1. A Problem on Point-Motions for which a Reference-Frame can so exist as to have the Motions of the Points, relative to it, Rectilinear and Mutually Proportional

1884 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 730-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Thomson
Keyword(s):  

In a paper read in this Society on the 3rd of March last, “On the Law of Inertia,” &c., I had occasion to adduce for consideration a problem to the following effect:—

Author(s):  
Nathalie Deruelle ◽  
Jean-Philippe Uzan

This chapter turns to the essential aspects of Newtonian dynamics. It argues that this chapter’s representation of an interaction by a vector means that it is limiting itself to phenomena that do not depend on the position or orientation of the reference frame in which they are studied. Since the algebra of the vector space to which the vectors representing the forces belong is linear, this chapter is de facto limiting itself to interactions which satisfy the superposition principle. The chapter also argues that the law of action and reaction, or Newton’s third law, states that the action of a body P2 on another body P1, described by f21, must be equal and opposite to the action f12 of P1 on P2. Finally, it introduces the principle of Galilean relativity and discusses moving frames and internal forces.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 341-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Anderle ◽  
M. C. Tanenbaum

AbstractObservations of artificial earth satellites provide a means of establishing an.origin, orientation, scale and control points for a coordinate system. Neither existing data nor future data are likely to provide significant information on the .001 angle between the axis of angular momentum and axis of rotation. Existing data have provided data to about .01 accuracy on the pole position and to possibly a meter on the origin of the system and for control points. The longitude origin is essentially arbitrary. While these accuracies permit acquisition of useful data on tides and polar motion through dynamio analyses, they are inadequate for determination of crustal motion or significant improvement in polar motion. The limitations arise from gravity, drag and radiation forces on the satellites as well as from instrument errors. Improvements in laser equipment and the launch of the dense LAGEOS satellite in an orbit high enough to suppress significant gravity and drag errors will permit determination of crustal motion and more accurate, higher frequency, polar motion. However, the reference frame for the results is likely to be an average reference frame defined by the observing stations, resulting in significant corrections to be determined for effects of changes in station configuration and data losses.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document