2. Solar Eclipse, 31st December 1880

1882 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
E. Sang

The elements for the compution of eclipses are given in the “Nautical Almanac” with precision sufficient for all ordinary purposes; but, when we wish to compare the lunar ephemeris with actual observation for the purpose of verifying or of improving our data, we must go somewhat more minutely into the investigation.Thus, in the List of Elements, p. 403, the changes in the right-ascension and declination of the sun and moon are supposed to be proportional to the times, while the moon's geocentric semidiameter, as well as the horizontal parallax, is supposed to be constant during the eclipse. In this way some exceedingly small errors are introduced into the calculation.

In the present improved state of astronomical observations, it is material to possess the readiest and most accurate means of finding the apparent time. The right ascension of certain fixed stars having been precisely obtained relatively with each other, and with the equinoctial points during the course of many years, affords the direct method of ascertaining the right ascension of the mid-heaven: hence the convenience of having the corrections of these stars in the form of tables, that the same may be taken out at one view with the arguments of the sun’s longitude, and of the moon’s node. For this purpose the mean diurnal motion is adapted to the longitude of the sun, as found in the Nautical Almanac, at the time the star passes the meridian. The mean epoch is reduced to the vernal equinox less four seconds, in order to render the corrections additive; which, being an universal period, the same applies to all parts of the world. To these tables Mr. Groombridge has subjoined some observations of the planets at and near the oppositions; also of the solstices of the last two years, and of the comet of 1819.


1823 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 39-52

The observations which have been made during the last summer, confirm in a very decided manner the results which formed the subject of my last communication; in which I laid before the Society the nature of the differences that exist between the computed places of the principal Stars of the Greenwich Catalogue, and those deduced from actual observation. It is not my present intention to offer any explana­tion of the cause of these phenomena, although many obvious conjectures present themselves, the value of which it will require perhaps many years to determine. It is now my principal object to consider the force of that explanation of the differences in question, which will most readily occur to every astronomer, namely, that the whole may arise either from error committed by the observer, or from defect in the instruments of observation: this objection being the more weighty from the circumstance, that the observations of three distant periods are employed, and that an error in those of either period (but particularly of the two latter) would ma­terially affect the result now under consideration. I believe that every person, in proportion to his experience in the use of astronomical instruments, (even of the most unexceptionable construction), will be cautious in admitting the accuracy of any results, with whatever care the observations may have been made, which appear to militate against any received theory of astronomy; and I shall have occasion myself to show, from the great discordances between instru­ments of the highest reputation, that this distrust is but too well founded. More particularly ought our suspicion to be excited, when such anomalies are found to exist, as bear some direct proportion to the zenith distances of the stars observed. In all such cases we should never hesitate, I think, to ascribe the anomalies to defective observation. If therefore in the present instance, any part of the discordances in question can be shown to depend on polar or zenith distances, I shall willingly admit, as to such part of them at least, that they are no otherwise of importance, than as affording data for leading to the detection of some hitherto undiscovered errors. The anomalies, however, that have led me on to this enquiry, and to which alone I attach any importance, are found to de­pend rather on the right ascensions, than on the declinations of the stars. Accordingly I found, while collecting observa­tions to form a catalogue for the present period, that I could more nearly predict the deviation of a star from its computed place, by knowing its right ascension, than its declination. Now it is not easy to conceive in what way the error of an instrument for measuring declination, fixed in the meridian, can be occasioned by any circumstance depending on the right ascension of a star to be observed.


The writer first refers to a series of experiments made under the direction of Professor Bache, for the determination of the difference of longitude between New York, Philadelphia and Washington, by means of the magnetic telegraph. By this series of experiments he considers it established that, by means of Morse’s telegraph, two clocks distant from each other 200 miles, can be compared together with the same precision as if they were placed side by side; and that the difference of longitude of two places can be determined with the same precision as the relative error of the clocks. These results were so satisfactory that Professor Bache determined to pro­secute them more extensively, and during the past summer comparisons have been made between New York and Cambridge observatory near Boston. The plan of operation this season was more matured than during the former. The comparisons were all made between a solar chronometer at Cambridge and a sidereal clock at New York. At ten o’clock in the evening, the two observatories having been put in telegraphic communication, when the seconds hand of the solar chronometer came round to 60 s , a signal was given at Cambridge, by pressing the key of the telegraph-register; at the same instant a click was heard at New York, and the time was recorded according to the sidereal clock. At the end of 10 s a second signal was given, which was also recorded at New York; at the end of another 10 s a third signal was given, and so on for sixty seconds. The Cambridge astronomer then commenced beating seconds by striking the key of the telegraph-register in coincidence with the beats of his chronometer. The New York astronomer compared the signals received with the beats of his clock, and waited for a coincidence. When the beats were sensibly synchronous the time was recorded, and the astronomer waited six minutes for another coincidence of beats. The Cambridge astronomer continued beating seconds for fifteen minutes , during which time the New York observer was sure of two coincidences, and might obtain three. When these were concluded, the New York astronomer in the same manner gave signals for one minute at intervals of 10 s , and then beat seconds for fifteen minutes, during which time the Cambridge astronomer obtained four or five coincidences upon his chronometer. This mode of comparison was practised every night, and it is considered that the uncertainty in the comparison of the time-pieces cannot exceed two or three hundredths of a second on any night; and in a series of comparisons the error may be regarded as entirely eliminated. Another mode of comparison which was practised is that of telegraphing star transits. A list of stars which culminate near our zenith at intervals of five or six minutes was prepared, and the observers, both at New York and Cambridge, were furnished with a copy. They then proceeded as follows: Cambridge selected two stars from the list, which we wall call A and B, and struck the key of his register at the instant when the star A passed each of the seven wires of his transit. These signals were heard at New York, and the times recorded. Cambridge then observed the transit of star B in the ordinary manner without telegraphing. New York then observed the transit of star A on his meridian in the usual manner; and struck his key at the instant the star B passed each of the seven wires of his transit, which signals were heard and recorded at Cambridge. The difference of longitude between New York and Cambridge is nearly twelve minutes, affording ample time for all these observations. Thus New York obtained upon his own clock the times of transit of star A over the meridians of Cambridge and New York; and Cambridge obtained upon his chronometer the times of transit of star B over the same meridians. The difference of these times gives the difference of longitude independent of the right ascension of the stars. Both observers then reversed the axis of their transit instruments; Cambridge selected a second pair of stars from the list, and the same series of observations was repeated as with the first pair. The error of collimation was thus eliminated, and by confining the observations to stars within about five degrees of the zenith, the influence of azimuthal error was avoided. The level being read at every reversal, the correction for it was applied by computation. In this manner it is hoped to eliminate every possible source of error, except that which arises from the personal habits of the observers. In order to eliminate this error, a travelling observer worked for a time at Cambridge and compared with the Cambridge astronomer; then came to New York and compared with the New York astronomer; then returned to Cambridge again, and so on as often as was thought necessary. Finally, at the conclusion of the campaign all the observers were to meet at Cambridge and make a general comparison of their modes of observation.


1951 ◽  
Vol 4 (04) ◽  
pp. 377-385

TheAbridged Nautical Almanacin its revised form, for the year 1952, has now appeared. In place of right ascension and the familiar quantitiesEandRwhich were adopted in 1929, it tabulates Greenwich hour angle in arc for the Sun, Moon, planets and Aries, and sidereal hour angle (or versed ascension) for the stars.Greenwich hourangle has been used in air almanacs for a number of years, and several surface almanacs have tabulated it as an alternative to right ascension; it is only recently, however, that it has been given exclusively in surface almanacs. Among the surface almanacs which tabulate G.H.A. at present are the American, Spanish, Argentine, Brazilian and Yugoslav.The redesign of theAbridged Nautical Almanachas been under consideration for many years, but the change was delayed first by the war, and then by the desire to avoid a transitional period during which the new G.H.A. andEandRwere given together; it was also decided to give as much notice of the proposed changes to users as possible. The design in substantially its present form was in fact accomplished in 1947, though the arrangement of the daily pages and much detailed work was carried out later.


1956 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Leo Randić

The problem of the determination of the observer's position on the Earth can be most easily solved in terms of the equatorial coordinates of the observer's zenith. From Fig. 1, in which the inner circle represents the Earth and the outer circle the celestial sphere, it can be seen that the zenithal point on the celestial sphere is its intersection with the prolongation of the radius to the observer's position. The geographical latitude of the observer is equal to the declination of the observer's zenith, and the geographical longitude is equal to the difference between Greenwich sidereal time (G.S.T.) and the right ascension of the observer's zenith. We can obtain G.S.T. by interpolation from a nautical almanac or directly from a separate watch or clock set to keep sidereal time.


The discordancies observed by Mr. South between the sun’s right ascension, as deduced from observation, and those given in the Nautical Almanac, follow a law so simple as not to allow of their being regarded as errors of observation, or arising from any casual cause, but justify us in attributing them to imperfections in the solar tables, with the exception of three days, in which there seems to be some ground to suspect error of computation. A single inspection of these discrepancies, Mr. Airy observes, suffices to show that they arise almost entirely from an error in the epoch, and an error in the place of the perigee. From the peculiar form of the tables in Vince’s Astronomy, which give great facility to the introduction of an error in the excentricity, he was induced at first to suspect that one might exist; but on calculation found the error in the equation of the centre so small as to be entirely insensible. He then proceeds to detail the process by which, from Mr. South’s observations, he has deduced the amount of the several errors, which consist in regarding the epoch, the mean anomaly, and the equation of the centre, as erroneous by three very small unknown quantities, and forming as many equations of condition for determining them as there are observations. These combined and resolved, so as to give the most probable result, lead to the conclusions, first, that the correction of the equation of the centre is evanescent; secondly, that the epochs of the sun must all be increased by 9", and the epochs of the perigee each by 1' 48".


1990 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 503-511
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Sôma ◽  
Masanori Miyamoto ◽  
Shinko Aoki

The right ascension of the radio source 3C273B, which serves as a right ascension zero point in radio astrometric work, has been determined from lunar occultations and photographic observations.We re-analyze here the lunar occultations of 3C273B using the recent precise lunar ephemeris and obtain its right ascension referred to the FK5 equinox at J2000.0. The obtained right ascension is 12h29m06s.6946±0s.007 at its mean observation epoch of 1963.62.Predictions of occultations of radio sources by the Moon and planets are also given. Observations of them are encouraged in order to improve the accuracy of the linkage between radio and stellar reference frames.


1970 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
V. K. Abalakin ◽  
J. Kovalevsky ◽  
D. H. Sadler ◽  
W. Fricke ◽  
A. M. Sinzi ◽  
...  

During the period under review two issues of the Astronomical Yearbook of the U.S.S.R. for the years 1971, 1972 have been published, and that for 1973 is in preparation. The positions and proper motions of the stars are in the FK4 system as recommended by Commission 4 in 1961. Further, as recommended at the meeting in Hamburg in 1964 (Trans. IAU, 12 B (1964), 105,1966) the IAU System of Astronomical Constants has been introduced into the tabulations of the day numbers, solar and lunar eclipses, ephemerides for physical observations of planets, and the factors S &C. The corresponding differential corrections to the Moon’s ephemeris as well as re-calculated eclipse data for 1971 have been tabulated separately in the Appendix to the Yearbook for 1971. As from the edition of the Yearbook for 1972, the lunar ephemeris j = 2 will be published in accordance with the recommendations adopted in Prague in 1967.The regular publication of the ephemeris of the lunar crater Mösting A has been continued in the editions of the Yearbook mentioned above.Fundamental ephemerides of the Sun, Moon, and planets have been printed in full conformity with the first part of the Astronomical Ephemeris circulated in advance by H. M. Nautical Almanac Office, Royal Greenwich Observatory.


1764 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 108-113

Reverend Sir, Having been at this place ever since the beginning of March, and hoping that the sky would prove favourable (as to my great joy it did) for observing both the lunar eclipse of March 17th, and the solar eclipse of yesterday, I proposed to captain Hutchinson, at whose house I stay, to have a meridian line drawn on the leads on the top of his house, in order to adjust his clock for observing the times of these eclipses by:


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document