David Prager Branner (ed.) (2006). The Chinese rime tables: linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 271.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Pp. viii+358.

Phonology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-458
Author(s):  
Zev Handel
Janus Head ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-321
Author(s):  
Kate Terezakis ◽  

This study rationally reconstructs Novalis's linguistic theory. It traces Novaliss assessment of earlier linguistic debates, illustrates Novaliss transformation of their central questions and uncovers Novaliss unique methodological proposal. It argues that in his critical engagement with Idealism, particularly regarding problems of representation and regulative positing, Novalis recognizes the need for both a philosophy of language and the artistic language designed to execute it. The paper contextualizes Novalis's linguistic appropriation and repudiation of Kant and explains how, even while Novaliss linguistic theory issues Kantianism such a challenge, it also begins to demonstrate the application of Kantian designs to linguistic philosophy. The modernity and potential of Novaliss proposal is evaluated and its significance for discussions in linguistic philosophy and aesthetics is advocated.


Author(s):  
Mark C Weeks

AbstractLaughter has achieved special significance within some of the more radical postmodern, and especially poststructuralist, discourses as an icon of liberated desire. Yet there is a sense in which laughter is anything but the expression of libidinal force, in which it can be seen to reflect a momentary subversion of desire. To understand this, poststructuralist linguistic theory itself can be employed (against itself), because in the linguistic philosophy of Jacques Derrida in particular there is a unique acknowledgment of the temporal dimension of communication and thought, and of the relationship of this to human desire. Such a model of communication provides insights into the way in which laughter is produced through the subversion of the human experience of temporality — and of desire, an effect of delayed satisfaction. The present article draws widely on the comic theoretical heritage, seeking to synthesize existing theories into a time-based model of how, and why, laughter is produced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document