A Response to Professor Norman Doe
Personally, I am feeling both buoyed up, and also a bit deflated, as a result of Norman's lecture (and the accompanying Ecclesiastical Law Journal article, to which the lecture is just an hors d'oeuvre). Buoyed up that, according to Oughton's treatise of 1728, in the seat of justice the dean should be addressed as Domine Judex or more frequently Domine Decane. Either will do excellently for the future! Deflated because, while Dean Phillimore's letters patent as Dean of the Arches recognised his ‘sound doctrine, good morals, purity of conscience’, my own were, probably rightly, considerably less effusive.
1999 ◽
Vol 40
(7)
◽
pp. 1141-1142
1961 ◽
Vol 13
◽
pp. 29-41
1978 ◽
Vol 48
◽
pp. 387-388
1967 ◽
Vol 25
◽
pp. 190-191
Keyword(s):
1993 ◽
Vol 51
◽
pp. 60-61
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
1991 ◽
Vol 55
(5)
◽
pp. 295-298
1991 ◽
Vol 55
(6)
◽
pp. 353-355
◽