The Status of Hospital Ethics Committees in Pennsylvania

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELLEN L. CSIKAI

Interdisciplinary hospital ethics committees have been the most common response to the mandates for ethical review procedures set forth by the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO, 1995 Standards), the American Hospital Association, and within institutions themselves. A 1989 national survey reported that 60% of hospitals had ethics committees. However, little is still known about the current state of these committees in hospitals, their composition, what functions are performed, or what issues are discussed.

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cavin P. Leeman ◽  
John C. Fletcher ◽  
Edward M. Spencer ◽  
Sigrid Fry-Revere

Hospital ethics committees have become widespread over the last 25 years, stimulated by the Quinlan decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court, the report of a President's Commission, and most recently by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO), which now man dates that each hospital seeking accreditation have a functioning process for the consideration of ethical issues in patient care. Laws and regulations in several states require that hospitals establish ethics committees, and some states stipulate that certain types of cases and disputes be taken to such committees. At least one state grants legal immunity to those who implement recommendations of an ethics committee.


HEC Forum ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
EricM. Meslin ◽  
Claire Rayner ◽  
Vic Larcher ◽  
Tony Hope ◽  
Julian Savulescu

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-407
Author(s):  
Eileen F. Baker ◽  
Joel M. Geiderman ◽  
Chadd K. Kraus ◽  
Rebecca Goett

HEC Forum ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-263
Author(s):  
Nancy Aldrich ◽  
Cheryl Macleod Darling

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Springer Loewy

Today's ever-widening expert/novice gap–in technology generally but in healthcare technology especially–has been implicated as both cause and consequence of a sharp rise in fundamental misunderstandings between medical professionals and lay populace. Recently created social roles (e.g., clinical medical ethicists) and institutions (e.g., hospital ethics committees) have further prompted critics to suggest that a multiplication of “disinterested” experts not only fails to resolve such misunderstandings, it compounds them. As a result, it should come as no surprise that the problem of paternalistic expertise has emerged as an ethical issue of immense interest from both a theoretical and practical standpoint. For this reason, a critical inquiry in healthcare today centers on finding a practical model that most adequately and accurately characterizes patient–physician relationships.


2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 512-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Zhou ◽  
D Xue ◽  
T Wang ◽  
Z L Tang ◽  
S K Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document