The Status of Women in Political Science: Female Participation in the Professoriate and the Study of Women and Politics in the Discipline

2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 4 (04) ◽  
pp. 530-532
Author(s):  
Jane Jaquette

The woman who is now entering (or contemplating entry) into the political science profession confronts a field that is biased against her (“political science is no place for a woman”) and which admits her only grudgingly and accords her limited status. The following is a summary of the data now available on the status of women in the profession.From the survey conducted by the APSA Committee on the Status of Women (1969, 473 departments responding), we have the following information on female participation:23.2% of undergraduate majors are women17.5% of graduates enrolled are women14.7% of Ph.D. candidates are women8.7% of those receiving the Ph.D. 1960-1968 are women8.6% of assistant professors are women6.7% of associate professors are women; and4.1 % of full professors are women.


1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 43-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Reid Sarkees ◽  
Nancy McGlen

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
arantxa elizondo

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 507-508
Author(s):  
Ronald Kassimir

With women holding 18% of the seats in parliament and a woman serving as a vice-president, the status of women at the apex of Uganda's political system is impressive compared to most other countries, including the United States. In noting this surprising fact and in chronicling how it came about, Aili Mari Tripp has written a thought-provoking book that raises serious questions about what it means. She draws on empir- ical research in the realms of both "high" politics (i.e., the halls of parliament) and "deep" politics (urban working-class neighborhoods and rural villages) and provides a rich account of Ugandan women's associational life and political mobili- zation.


Author(s):  
Flavia D. Freidenberg

This article reflects about the weight women have had in the field of Political Science in and about Latin America during the last decade. This text not only describes and analyzes the existing gender gap in compared research about Latin America, but also it focuses the attention in how the discipline as a profession is exercised. The main objective of this paper is to generate initial reflections about of the status of women in the discipline in Latin America as well as how we do research, what we teach and what we publish (and with whom) in the discipline. The women are underrepresented in Political Science meetings, syllabi, and editorial boards. This is done under the premise that Political Science is a gendered discipline that reproduces exclusionary views, beliefs, and practices and also operates under a certain level of “gender blindness”


2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
pp. 333-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura van Assendelft ◽  
Wendy Gunther-Canada ◽  
Julie Dolan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document