scholarly journals The stem-loop binding protein forms a highly stable and specific complex with the 3′ stem-loop of histone mRNAs

RNA ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIEL J. BATTLE ◽  
JENNIFER A. DOUDNA
Keyword(s):  
Binding Protein ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Specific Complex

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of Stem-Loop Binding Protein (SLBP) on Two Threonines Triggers Degradation of SLBP, the Sole Cell Cycle-Regulated Factor Required for Regulation of Histone mRNA Processing, at the End of S Phase

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1590-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianxing Zheng ◽  
Zbigniew Dominski ◽  
Xiao-Cui Yang ◽  
Phillip Elms ◽  
Christy S. Raska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Amino Acids ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mrna Processing ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Nuclear Extracts

ABSTRACT The replication-dependent histone mRNAs, the only eukaryotic mRNAs that do not have poly(A) tails, are present only in S-phase cells. Coordinate posttranscriptional regulation of histone mRNAs is mediated by the stem-loop at the 3′ end of histone mRNAs. The protein that binds the 3′ end of histone mRNA, stem-loop binding protein (SLBP), is required for histone pre-mRNA processing and is involved in multiple aspects of histone mRNA metabolism. SLBP is also regulated during the cell cycle, accumulating as cells enter S phase and being rapidly degraded as cells exit S phase. Mutation of any residues in a TTP sequence (amino acids 60 to 62) or mutation of a consensus cyclin binding site (amino acids 99 to 104) stabilizes SLBP in G2 and mitosis. These two threonines are phosphorylated in late S phase, as determined by mass spectrometry (MS) of purified SLBP from late S-phase cells, triggering SLBP degradation. Cells that express a stable SLBP still degrade histone mRNA at the end of S phase, demonstrating that degradation of SLBP is not required for histone mRNA degradation. Nuclear extracts from G1 and G2 cells are deficient in histone pre-mRNA processing, which is restored by addition of recombinant SLBP, indicating that SLBP is the only cell cycle-regulated factor required for histone pre-mRNA processing.

scholarly journals The Histone 3′-Terminal Stem-Loop-Binding Protein Enhances Translation through a Functional and Physical Interaction with Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4G (eIF4G) and eIF3

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 7853-7867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Ling ◽  
Simon J. Morley ◽  
Virginia M. Pain ◽  
William F. Marzluff ◽  
Daniel R. Gallie
Keyword(s):  
Binding Protein ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Translational Efficiency ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Loop Structure ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Stem Loop Structure

ABSTRACT Metazoan cell cycle-regulated histone mRNAs are unique cellular mRNAs in that they terminate in a highly conserved stem-loop structure instead of a poly(A) tail. Not only is the stem-loop structure necessary for 3′-end formation but it regulates the stability and translational efficiency of histone mRNAs. The histone stem-loop structure is recognized by the stem-loop-binding protein (SLBP), which is required for the regulation of mRNA processing and turnover. In this study, we show that SLBP is required for the translation of mRNAs containing the histone stem-loop structure. Moreover, we show that the translation of mRNAs ending in the histone stem-loop is stimulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells expressing mammalian SLBP. The translational function of SLBP genetically required eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), eIF4G, and eIF3, and expressed SLBP coisolated with S. cerevisiae initiation factor complexes that bound the 5′ cap in a manner dependent on eIF4G and eIF3. Furthermore, eIF4G coimmunoprecipitated with endogenous SLBP in mammalian cell extracts and recombinant SLBP and eIF4G coisolated. These data indicate that SLBP stimulates the translation of histone mRNAs through a functional interaction with both the mRNA stem-loop and the 5′ cap that is mediated by eIF4G and eIF3.

scholarly journals Stem-Loop Binding Protein, the Protein That Binds the 3′ End of Histone mRNA, Is Cell Cycle Regulated by Both Translational and Posttranslational Mechanisms

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 4188-4198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Whitfield ◽  
Lian-Xing Zheng ◽  
Amy Baldwin ◽  
Tomohiko Ohta ◽  
Myra M. Hurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mrna Processing ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Cycle Regulation

ABSTRACT The expression of the replication-dependent histone mRNAs is tightly regulated during the cell cycle. As cells progress from G1 to S phase, histone mRNA levels increase 35-fold, and they decrease again during G2 phase. Replication-dependent histone mRNAs are the only metazoan mRNAs that lack polyadenylated tails, ending instead in a conserved stem-loop. Much of the cell cycle regulation is posttranscriptional and is mediated by the 3′ stem-loop. A 31-kDa stem-loop binding protein (SLBP) binds the 3′ end of histone mRNA. The SLBP is necessary for pre-mRNA processing and accompanies the histone mRNA to the cytoplasm, where it is a component of the histone messenger RNP. We used synchronous CHO cells selected by mitotic shakeoff and HeLa cells synchronized at the G1/S or the M/G1 boundary to study the regulation of SLBP during the cell cycle. In each system the amount of SLBP is regulated during the cell cycle, increasing 10- to 20-fold in the late G1 and then decreasing in the S/G2border. SLBP mRNA levels are constant during the cell cycle. SLBP is regulated at the level of translation as cells progress from G1 to S phase, and the protein is rapidly degraded as they progress into G2. Regulation of SLBP may account for the posttranscriptional component of the cell cycle regulation of histone mRNA.

scholarly journals Nuclear Import of the Stem–Loop Binding Protein and Localization during the Cell Cycle

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2960-2971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Erkmann ◽  
Eric J. Wagner ◽  
Jian Dong ◽  
Yanping Zhang ◽  
Ulrike Kutay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Import Receptors ◽  
Mrna Binding

A key factor involved in the processing of histone pre-mRNAs in the nucleus and translation of mature histone mRNAs in the cytoplasm is the stem–loop binding protein (SLBP). In this work, we have investigated SLBP nuclear transport and subcellular localization during the cell cycle. SLBP is predominantly nuclear under steady-state conditions and localizes to the cytoplasm during S phase when histone mRNAs accumulate. Consistently, SLBP mutants that are defective in histone mRNA binding remain nuclear. As assayed in heterokaryons, export of SLBP from the nucleus is dependent on histone mRNA binding, demonstrating that SLBP on its own does not possess any nuclear export signals. We find that SLBP interacts with the import receptors Impα/Impβ and Transportin-SR2. Moreover, complexes formed between SLBP and the two import receptors are disrupted by RanGTP. We have further shown that SLBP is imported by both receptors in vitro. Three sequences in SLBP required for Impα/Impβ binding were identified. Simultaneous mutation of all three sequences was necessary to abolish SLBP nuclear localization in vivo. In contrast, we were unable to identify an in vivo role for Transportin-SR2 in SLBP nuclear localization. Thus, only the Impα/Impβ pathway contributes to SLBP nuclear import in HeLa cells.

scholarly journals The stem-loop binding protein regulates translation of histone mRNA during mammalian oogenesis

2005 ◽  
Vol 286 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Allard ◽  
Qin Yang ◽  
William F. Marzluff ◽  
Hugh J. Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Binding Protein ◽  
Histone Mrna ◽  
Stem Loop

scholarly journals Histone mRNAs Do Not Accumulate during S Phase of either Mitotic or Endoreduplicative Cycles in the Chordate Oikopleura dioica

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 5391-5403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariacristina Chioda ◽  
Fabio Spada ◽  
Ragnhild Eskeland ◽  
Eric M. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Oikopleura Dioica ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Complete Cell

ABSTRACT Metazoan histones are generally classified as replication-dependent or replacement variants. Replication-dependent histone genes contain cell cycle-responsive promoter elements, their transcripts terminate in an unpolyadenylated conserved stem-loop, and their mRNAs accumulate sharply during S phase. Replacement variant genes lack cell cycle-responsive promoter elements, their polyadenylated transcripts lack the stem-loop, and they are expressed at low levels throughout the cell cycle. During early development of some organisms with rapid cleavage cycles, replication-dependent mRNAs are not fully S phase restricted until complete cell cycle regulation is achieved. The accumulation of polyadenylated transcripts during this period has been considered incompatible with metazoan development. We show here that histone metabolism in the urochordate Oikopleura dioica does not accord with some key tenets of the replication-dependent/replacement variant paradigm. During the premetamorphic mitotic phase of development, expressed variants shared characteristics of replication-dependent histones, including the 3′ stem-loop, but, in contrast, were extensively polyadenylated. After metamorphosis, when cells in many tissues enter endocycles, there was a global downregulation of histone transcript levels, with most variant transcripts processed at the stem-loop. Contrary to the 30-fold S-phase upregulation of histone transcripts described in common metazoan model organisms, we observed essentially constant histone transcript levels throughout both mitotic and endoreduplicative cell cycles.

scholarly journals Distinct Poly(rC) Binding Protein KH Domain Determinants for Poliovirus Translation Initiation and Viral RNA Replication

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (23) ◽  
pp. 12008-12022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon L. Walter ◽  
Todd B. Parsley ◽  
Ellie Ehrenfeld ◽  
Bert L. Semler
Keyword(s):  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Rna Synthesis ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Replication ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Loop Structure ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Stem Loop Structure

ABSTRACT The limited coding capacity of picornavirus genomic RNAs necessitates utilization of host cell factors in the completion of an infectious cycle. One host protein that plays a role in both translation initiation and viral RNA synthesis is poly(rC) binding protein 2 (PCBP2). For picornavirus RNAs containing type I internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements, PCBP2 binds the major stem-loop structure (stem-loop IV) in the IRES and is essential for translation initiation. Additionally, the binding of PCBP2 to the 5′-terminal stem-loop structure (stem-loop I or cloverleaf) in concert with viral protein 3CD is required for initiation of RNA synthesis directed by poliovirus replication complexes. PCBP1, a highly homologous isoform of PCBP2, binds to poliovirus stem-loop I with an affinity similar to that of PCBP2; however, PCBP1 has reduced affinity for stem-loop IV. Using a dicistronic poliovirus RNA, we were able to functionally uncouple translation and RNA replication in PCBP-depleted extracts. Our results demonstrate that PCBP1 rescues RNA replication but is not able to rescue translation initiation. We have also generated mutated versions of PCBP2 containing site-directed lesions in each of the three RNA-binding domains. Specific defects in RNA binding to either stem-loop I and/or stem-loop IV suggest that these domains may have differential functions in translation and RNA replication. These predictions were confirmed in functional assays that allow separation of RNA replication activities from translation. Our data have implications for differential picornavirus template utilization during viral translation and RNA replication and suggest that specific PCBP2 domains may have distinct roles in these activities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document