scholarly journals A systematic review of behavioural weight-loss interventions involving primary-care physicians in overweight and obese primary-care patients (1999–2011)

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 2083-2099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sze Lin Yoong ◽  
Mariko Carey ◽  
Rob Sanson-Fisher ◽  
Alice Grady

AbstractObjectiveThe present review aimed to examine the effectiveness of behavioural weight-loss interventions involving primary-care physicians in producing weight loss in overweight and obese primary-care patients.DesignA systematic review was conducted by searching online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO and SCOPUS) from January 1999 to December 2011. All abstracts were screened and coded for eligibility. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group quality criteria were used to assess the methodological adequacy of included studies. Information related to study design, population characteristics and intervention details was extracted.SettingPrimary care.SubjectsOverweight or obese (defined as having a BMI ≥ 25·0 kg/m2) primary-care patients.ResultsSixteen different studies were included. Of these, six assessed primary-care physicians’ delivery of weight-loss counselling; nine assessed weight-loss counselling delivered by non-physician personnel with monitoring by primary-care physicians; and one assessed a multi-component intervention. Overall, high-intensity weight-loss counselling by primary-care physicians resulted in moderate but not clinically significant weight loss. High-intensity weight-loss counselling delivered by non-physicians, meal replacements delivered in conjunction with dietitian counselling and referral to commercial weight-loss centre programmes accompanied by regular monitoring by a primary-care physician were effective in producing clinically significant weight loss. Dietitian-delivered care appeared effective in producing weight loss regardless of level of intervention intensity.ConclusionsOverall, there were few studies on this topic and the methodological rigour of some included studies was poor. Additional studies assessing the effectiveness and acceptability of potential interventions are needed to confirm these findings.

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Levine ◽  
Stella Savarimuthu ◽  
Allison Squires ◽  
Joseph Nicholson ◽  
Melanie Jay

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J Gallo ◽  
Seungyoung Hwang ◽  
Christine Truong ◽  
Charles F Reynolds ◽  
Adam P Spira

Abstract Study Objectives We analyzed data from a practice-based randomized controlled trial within 20 primary care practices located in greater New York City, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh to determine whether persistent or worsening sleep disturbance plays a role in the outcomes of depression and suicidal ideation at 1 year in older adults with depression. Methods The study sample consisted of 599 adults aged 60 years and older meeting criteria for major depression or clinically significant minor depression. Longitudinal analysis via growth curve mixture modeling was carried out to classify patients as having worsening, persistent, or improving sleep over 1 year. Results At 1-year follow-up, compared with patients with improving sleep, those with worsening sleep were more likely to have a diagnosis of major depression (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 28.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.15 to 67.34), a diagnosis of clinically significant minor depression (aOR = 11.88, 95% CI 5.67 to 24.89), and suicidal ideation (aOR = 1.10, 1.005 to 1.199), and were half as likely to achieve remission (aOR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.57). Patients with persistent sleep disturbance showed similar but attenuated results. Conclusions Older primary care patients with depression who exhibit worsening or persistent sleep disturbance were at increased risk for persistent depression and suicidal ideation 1 year later. The pattern of sleep disturbance over time may be an important signal for exploration by primary care physicians of depression and suicidal ideation among older adults with depression. Clinical Trial Registration NCT00279682.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany Barone Gibbs ◽  
Dana Tudorascu ◽  
Cindy Bryce ◽  
Diane Comer ◽  
Gary Fischer ◽  
...  

Introduction: Though weight loss can improve health, weight regain is common. Primary care physicians are uniquely positioned to provide counseling for weight loss maintenance given their longitudinal care of patients, yet evidence of simple lifestyle recommendations for maintaining weight loss in primary care patients is lacking. Our objective was to characterize longitudinal associations between diet habits and weight change among primary care patients with recent, intentional weight loss of at least 5%. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from a weight loss maintenance clinical trial in a primary care setting that compared two interventions delivered through the electronic health record: continued coaching vs. tracking only. Dietary habits [fried foods, desserts, fruits and vegetables (F&V), and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB)] were measured by the Connor Diet Habits Survey. Linear regression models were used to evaluate associations (overall and by randomized group) between changes in dietary habits and weight separately at 6- and 24-month follow-up, adjusted for baseline diet habit, age, gender and clinic location. Results: Participants (n=192) were 74% female, 87% white and had baseline mean (SD) age of 53 (12) years, body mass index of 30.4 (5.9) kg/m 2 , and recent weight loss of 11 (8) percent. Overall, participants had mean (SD) weight loss of 0.18 (5.04) kg at 6 months (n=169) and weight gain of 3.26 (7.60) kg at 24 months (n=140). At 6 months, a 1 serving per week increase in dessert intake was associated with 0.53 kg (p=0.030) greater weight gain. Fried foods, F&V, and SSB were not associated with 6-month weight changes. However, by 24 months, an increase of 1 serving per week was associated with greater weight gain of 0.54 kg (p=0.043) for fried foods, 0.80 kg (p=0.031) for desserts, and 2.01 kg (p=0.002) for SSB. A decrease of 1 F&V serving per day was associated with a 0.82 kg (p=0.008) greater weight gain at 24 months. When stratified by randomized group, associations were stronger in the continued coaching vs. tracking only arm. Conclusions: Increased consumption of desserts was associated with weight regain at 6 and 24 months, while increased fried foods and SSB, and decreased F&V were associated with weight regain at 24 months. These data suggest that simple strategies such as improving or at least maintaining dietary intake of fried foods, desserts, F&V, and SSB could help facilitate long-term weight loss maintenance in primary care patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Patrick O’Neil ◽  
W. Timothy Garvey ◽  
J. Michael Gonzalez-Campoy ◽  
Pablo Mora ◽  
Rafael Violante Ortiz ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp18X697085
Author(s):  
Trudy Bekkering ◽  
Bert Aertgeerts ◽  
Ton Kuijpers ◽  
Mieke Vermandere ◽  
Jako Burgers ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe WikiRecs evidence summaries and recommendations for clinical practice are developed using trustworthy methods. The process is triggered by studies that may potentially change practice, aiming at implementing new evidence into practice fast.AimTo share our first experiences developing WikiRecs for primary care and to reflect on the possibilities and pitfalls of this method.MethodIn March 2017, we started developing WikiRecs for primary health care to speed up the process of making potentially practice-changing evidence in clinical practice. Based on a well-structured question a systematic review team summarises the evidence using the GRADE approach. Subsequently, an international panel of primary care physicians, methodological experts and patients formulates recommendations for clinical practice. The patient representatives are involved as full guideline panel members. The final recommendations and supporting evidence are disseminated using various platforms, including MAGICapp and scientific journals.ResultsWe are developing WikiRecs on two topics: alpha-blockers for urinary stones and supervised exercise therapy for intermittent claudication. We did not face major problems but will reflect on issues we had to solve so far. We anticipate having the first WikiRecs for primary care available at the end of 2017.ConclusionThe WikiRecs process is a promising method — that is still evolving — to rapidly synthesise and bring new evidence into primary care practice, while adhering to high quality standards.


Author(s):  
Megan A McVay ◽  
William S Yancy ◽  
Gary G Bennett ◽  
Erica Levine ◽  
Seung-Hye Jung ◽  
...  

Abstract Evidence-based behavioral weight loss treatment is under-utilized. To increase initiation of treatment, we developed a single-session, online, primary care-based intervention (“mobilization tool”). We evaluated the mobilization tool's acceptability for primary care patients with obesity, trial design feasibility, and signal of an effect of the tool on treatment initiation. In this cluster randomized feasibility trial, primary care providers (PCPs) were randomized to a mobilization tool or comparator tool arm. Patients with obesity and a scheduled appointment with a randomized PCP were assigned to complete the mobilization or comparator tool prior to their appointment. The online mobilization tool asks patients to answer questions about a variety of weight-related topics and then provides automated, tailored feedback that addresses psychosocial determinants of weight loss treatment initiation. The comparator tool provided a nontailored description of treatments. All participants were offered free enrollment in behavioral weight loss treatments. Six PCPs were randomized. Sixty patients (57% female; 66% white; aged 55 ± 13 years) participated in this study of 296 contacted for eligibility evaluation (20.2%). Six-month follow-up assessments were completed by 65% (22/34) of the mobilization and 73% (19/26) of comparator tool participants. Participants completing the acceptability survey reported that the mobilization tool was usable, enjoyable, informative, and useful. Weight loss treatment was initiated by 59% (n = 19) of mobilization and 33% (n = 8) of comparator tool participants. The mobilization tool shows promise for increasing treatment initiation among primary care patients, which may increase population weight loss. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02708121.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document