scholarly journals Effect of either soya or linseed oil supplementation of grazing dairy cows on milk production and methane emissions

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Rowntree ◽  
K M Pierce ◽  
F Buckley ◽  
K J Petrie ◽  
J J Callan ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 175 ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Muñoz ◽  
Sara Hube ◽  
Jorge M. Morales ◽  
Tianhai Yan ◽  
Emilio M. Ungerfeld

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 280
Author(s):  
Tommy M. Boland ◽  
Karina M. Pierce ◽  
Alan K. Kelly ◽  
David A. Kenny ◽  
Mary B. Lynch ◽  
...  

The authors wish to make a change to the published paper [...]


Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2380
Author(s):  
Tommy M. Boland ◽  
Karina M. Pierce ◽  
Alan K. Kelly ◽  
David A. Kenny ◽  
Mary B. Lynch ◽  
...  

Emissions of methane (CH4) from dairy production systems are environmentally detrimental and represent an energy cost to the cow. This study evaluated the effect of varying C18 fatty acid sources on CH4 emissions, milk production and rumen methanogen populations in grazing lactating dairy cows. Forty-five Holstein Friesian cows were randomly allocated to one of three treatments (n = 15). Cows were offered 15 kg dry matter (DM)/d of grazed pasture plus supplementary concentrates (4 kg DM/d) containing either stearic acid (SA), linseed oil (LO), or soy oil (SO). Cows offered LO and SO had lower pasture DM intake (DMI) than those offered SA (11.3, 11.5 vs. 12.6 kg/d). Cows offered LO and SO had higher milk yield (21.0, 21.3 vs. 19.7 kg/d) and milk protein yield (0.74, 0.73 vs. 0.67 kg/d) than those offered SA. Emissions of CH4 (245 vs. 293, 289 g/d, 12.4 vs. 15.7, 14.8 g/kg of milk and 165 vs. 207, 195 g/kg of milk solids) were lower for cows offered LO than those offered SA or SO. Methanobrevibacter ruminantium abundance was reduced in cows offered LO compared to SA. Offering supplementary concentrates containing LO can reduce enteric CH4 emissions from pasture fed dairy cows.


2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (11) ◽  
pp. 6582-6590 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.F. O’Neill ◽  
M.H. Deighton ◽  
B.M. O’Loughlin ◽  
N. Galvin ◽  
M. O’Donovan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C.S. Mayne ◽  
S.C.P. Woodcock ◽  
A.J. Clements

Buffer-feeding of grazing dairy cows, by allowing cows access to forage for a few hours each day, has been widely advocated as a means of maintaining high animal performance whilst enabling efficient sward utilization. However, in practice, responses to buffer-feeding with January/February calving cows have been extremely variable. The objective of this study was to examine if part of the variability in response could be explained by differences in the level of nutrition during the winter feed period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document