scholarly journals Quality Criteria for Microplastic Effect Studies in the Context of Risk Assessment: A Critical Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (19) ◽  
pp. 11692-11705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera N. de Ruijter ◽  
Paula E. Redondo-Hasselerharm ◽  
Todd Gouin ◽  
Albert A. Koelmans
Chemosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 133169
Author(s):  
Simranjeet Singh ◽  
TS Sunil Kumar Naik ◽  
Amith G. Anil ◽  
Jaskaran Dhiman ◽  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudi Purnama Dani

Penelitian ini berfokus pada halal dan haram, yang merupakan konsep yang harus diterapkan di semua aspek kehidupan Muslim. Setiap ndividu harus mampu membedakan produk dan layanan halal ataupun haram. Gagal dalam memilih barang halal, konsumen menghadapi berbagai macam risiko, seperti kesehatan, psikologis, lingkungan, sosial, kualitas, keuangan, dan risiko kehilangan waktu. Temuan penelitian ini bisa membantu industri pariwisata dalam memahami cara memperlakukan dan melayani keduanya Muslim dan non-Muslim yang sensitif terhadap barang halal.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris C.I. Chao ◽  
Efrem Violato ◽  
Brendan Concannon ◽  
Charlotte McCartan ◽  
Katarzyna Nicpon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Several forms of bias, including ethnic and gender bias, are thought to impact evaluations on Clinical Performance Assessments (CPAs). Unfairness may influence student learning attitudes if a loss of trust causes a lack of engagement in learning. Understanding the biases occurring in CPAs can lead to well-designed examiner training to ensure equality and fairness. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the current evidence in the literature for ethnic and/or gender bias by examiners evaluating pre-licensure healthcare students in CPAs using standardized patients (SPs). Methods: Literature was systematically searched in CINAHL, PubMed and Medline from inception to February 2019, and no date range was set. Studies related to the investigation of ethnic and/or gender biases occurring in CPAs using SPs for examining health professions students were selected. A systematic review was conducted to assess the methodological quality and strength of evidence of relevant research and to identify if any potential ethnic and/or gender bias occurred in CPAs. The Guidelines for Critical Review were used to appraise the selected studies. Results: Nine studies published from 2003 to 2017 were retrieved for review. Three studies met all the Guidelines for Critical Review quality criteria, indicating stronger evidence of their outcomes, two of the studies reported ethnic and/or gender bias existing in the CPAs. Overall, four studies found ethnic and/or gender bias in CPAs, but all study results had small effect sizes. Conclusions: No systematic and consistent bias was found across the studies; nonetheless, the possibility of ethnic or gender bias by some examiners cannot be ignored. To minimize potential examiner bias, the investigation of Frame of Reference training, multiple examiners per station, and combination assessments in CPAs is recommended.


2020 ◽  
Vol 198 ◽  
pp. 110666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Ding ◽  
Shilin Du ◽  
Yahui Zhang ◽  
Hongliang Wang ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document