scholarly journals The Phase Envelope of Multicomponent Mixtures in the Presence of a Capillary Pressure Difference

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (22) ◽  
pp. 6530-6538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego R. Sandoval ◽  
Wei Yan ◽  
Michael L. Michelsen ◽  
Erling H. Stenby
Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 7029
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Blauciak ◽  
Pawel Szymanski ◽  
Dariusz Mikielewicz

This paper presents the results of experiments carried out on a specially designed experimental rig designed for the study of capillary pressure generated in the Loop Heat Pipe (LHP) evaporator. The commercially available porous structure made of sintered stainless steel constitutes the wick. Three different geometries of the porous wicks were tested, featuring the pore radius of 1, 3 and 7 µm. Ethanol and water as two different working fluids were tested at three different evaporator temperatures and three different installation charges. The paper firstly presents distributions of generated pressure in the LHP, indicating that the capillary pressure difference is generated in the porous structure. When installing with a wick that has a pore size of 1 μm and water as a working fluid, the pressure difference can reach up to 2.5 kPa at the installation charge of 65 mL. When installing with a wick that has a pore size of 1 μm and ethanol as a working fluid, the pressure difference can reach up to 2.1 kPa at the installation charge of 65 mL. The integral characteristics of the LHP were developed, namely, the mass flow rate vs. applied heat flux for both fluids. The results show that water offers larger pressure differences for developing the capillary pressure effect in the installation in comparison to ethanol. Additionally, this research presents the feasibility of manufacturing inexpensive LHPs with filter medium as a wick material and its influence on the LHP’s thermal performance.


AIChE Journal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 868-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias K. Nikolaidis ◽  
Ioannis G. Economou ◽  
Georgios C. Boulougouris ◽  
Loukas D. Peristeras

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Sandoval ◽  
Wei Yan ◽  
Michael L. Michelsen ◽  
Erling H. Stenby

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (06) ◽  
pp. 1550077 ◽  
Author(s):  
MINGCHAO LIANG ◽  
JUNHONG WEI ◽  
HONGMEI HAN ◽  
CHENGGUO FU ◽  
JIANJUN LIU

The capillary pressure is one of the crucial parameters in many science and engineering applications such as composite materials, interface science, chemical engineering, oil exploration, etc. The drop/bubble formation and its mechanisms that affect the permeability of porous media have steadily attracted much attention in the past. When a drop/bubble moves from a larger capillary to a smaller one, it is often obstructed by an additional pressure difference caused by the capillary force. In this paper, a comprehensive model is derived for the capillary pressure difference when a drop/bubble flows through a constricted capillary, i.e. a geometrically constricted passage with an abrupt change in radius. The proposed model is expressed as a function of the smaller capillary radius, pore-throat ratio, contact angle, surface tension and length of the drop/bubble in the smaller capillary. The model predictions are compared with the available experimental data, and good agreement is found between them.


Fractals ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. 217-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
YANJUN LIU ◽  
BOMING YU

A fractal relative permeability model is derived which takes into account the capillary pressure difference effect. The proposed model is expressed as a function of saturation, fractal dimensions, fluid properties and capillary pressure difference, and there is no empirical constant introduced in the proposed model. The effect of the capillary pressure difference on the relative permeability is analyzed, and the results indicate that the capillary pressure difference has the significant influence on the relative permeability at low saturation. The predicted relative permeabilities are compared with the available experimental data. Good agreement is found between the present model predictions and the available experimental data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (13) ◽  
pp. 5291-5300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego R. Sandoval ◽  
Michael L. Michelsen ◽  
Wei Yan ◽  
Erling H. Stenby

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 969-983
Author(s):  
Zhanke Li ◽  
Weidong Cao ◽  
Zhi-Feng Liu ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Jinbiao Yu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document